The Breakdown: Could Julian Assange be Prosecuted for Spying?

The Breakdown: Could Julian Assange be Prosecuted for Spying?

The Breakdown: Could Julian Assange be Prosecuted for Spying?

Can Julian Assange and the New York Times face criminal prosecution under the federal Espionage Act?

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Chris Hayes and American University Law Professor Steve Vladeck ask, can Julian Assange and the New York Times face criminal prosecution under the federal Espionage Act?

The Breakdown Can Julian Assange face criminal prosecution under the Espionage Act?  Used sparingly since its 1917 inception, the Espionage Act has prosecuted leakers a handful of times but rarely gone after foreign nationals or those who published leaked information. And if Assange is prosecuted, could the New York Times also face criminal charges for publishing the very same material?  DC Editor Chris Hayes tackles this topic with American University Law Professor Steve Vladeck—who also testified on this very topic before the House on Thursday—on this week’s edition of The Breakdown.

Related Links

Vladeck’s posts at PrawfsBlawg.
Vladeck’s prepared statement about the Espionage Act for the Hearing before the House Committee on the Judiciary.
The Espionage Act’s Shameful and Forgotten History” at The Atlantic.

Subscribe to The Breakdown on iTunes to listen to fresh takes on the confusing concepts that make politics, economics and government tick. A new episode every week!

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x