Dan Osborn Is Ready to Mount an Even Bolder Campaign Against Our Billionaire-Dominated Politics
The independent populist from Nebraska, who came close to winning in 2024, is running to unseat one of the Senate’s wealthiest and most self-serving members in 2026.
Dan Osborn, the Nebraska steamfitter whose unexpectedly strong independent US Senate campaign drew national attention in 2024, is running once more against not just a sitting Republican senator but the corruption of billionaire-bought politics.
Osborn’s name will appear on an independent ballot line in November 2026, opposite that of the wealthy Republican incumbent Pete Ricketts. But in many senses, the real target of the former union leader’s candidacy is the corruption of American democracy that has allowed filthy-rich campaign donors to buy influence within both major parties. “I’m tired of being ruled by billionaires who don’t know what life is like for normal working people,” says Osborn, expressing a frustration that has been mounting among Americans who are struggling to pay their bills while a new class of oligarchs is accumulating so much wealth that there is now open speculation about which billionaire will become the world’s first trillionaire. The volume on that discussion went up considerably last week after Congress passed the so-called “One, Big, Beautiful Bill,” which hands massive tax breaks to the superrich while gutting funding for Medicaid and programs that feed the hungry.
One of the Republican senators who took the lead in supporting the largest upward transfer of wealth in US history was Ricketts, the eldest son of billionaire Joe Ricketts. After engineering his own appointment to an open Senate seat in 2023, Pete Ricketts is now preparing to seek a full six-year term in 2026. A win could give the scion of a family that has long been associated with high-stakes investments and financial speculation a prime opportunity to expand the already vast fortunes of the billionaire class. That doesn’t sit right with Osborn, who says, “I don’t believe private financiers should run the American economy,” and who illustrates his concern with a simple question: “Do you really think Pete Ricketts, whose family has amassed billions by financial speculation, wants to rein in Wall Street?”
Osborn is betting that Nebraskans will agree with him and reject the absurdity of handing one of America’s most identifiable plutocrats an extended opportunity to make the rich richer. So the veteran union activist announced Tuesday that he’ll challenge the incumbent senator. And, unlike when he launched his 2024 bid—which ultimately earned him 47 percent of the vote against the state’s senior Republican senator, Deb Fischer, political observers and Nebraska voters are taking Osborn’s challenge to Ricketts a lot more seriously.
“I feel like there is still an appetite for my brand of politics…. I still believe that we need more champions for people who work for a living. I don’t think we have enough of that,” Osborn told The Nation in an exclusive interview prior to his announcement.
True to his Nebraska upbringing, Osborn might be just a tad modest about the growing appeal of his unapologetic economic populism. The reality is that, since Democrats lost the presidency and Congress in 2024 with a campaign that was widely accused of failing to place sufficient emphasis on working-class concerns, there’s been a spike in interest in Osborn’s brand of politics. That’s because he takes on the failure of both major parties to stand firmly on the side of working Americans of all races, backgrounds, and regions.
Osborn is leaning into his populism as he prepares to challenge a son of privilege in 2026. “I think Ricketts kind of embodies [the empty promise that] ‘the billionaires are going to come save us,’ trickle-down economics, all of this stuff that doesn’t work,” he says. “I feel like we’re in a race to the bottom, and these guys are just [creating a situation where there is] that migration of wealth going to the top. They’re carving it out for themselves.”
That reality has been well illustrated during the first months of Donald Trump’s second term. The billionaire president packed his cabinet with other billionaires, and briefly ceded control of the reorganization of the federal government to Elon Musk, the wealthiest man in the world. For tens of millions of Americans, the stark evidence of elite self-dealing and corruption has created an insatiable hunger for a politics that challenges billionaire power. Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, an independent who has spoken enthusiastically about Osborn’s populist approach, recognized that mounting frustration among Americans in general, and Nebraskans in particular, last February when he launched his national “Fighting Oligarchy” tour in Omaha. And the biggest political story of the first months of Trump’s second term was the overwhelming rejection of Musk’s $25 million “investment” in a campaign to tip Wisconsin’s state Supreme Court to support a Trump-backed conservative.
Speaking as the Senate was rushing to approve massive tax cuts for the rich, Osborn observed—again with a measure of understatement—that 2026 might be a very good year in which to campaign on a platform that focuses on making billionaires pay their fair share, raising wages for workers, removing barriers to organize unions, helping family farmers stay on the land, protecting Main Street small businesses, and holding multinational corporations to account—as the US Navy veteran did when he served as president of Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union Local 50G and led a high-profile 2021 strike at the sprawling Kellogg’s plant in Omaha.
The prominence he achieved as a strike leader led Nebraska union activists and their allies to urge Osborn to run for the Senate in 2024. The fact that he mounted a dynamic campaign that almost defeated Fischer, a veteran Republican politician who had deep roots in a very red state, shook up the politics of Nebraska and drew significant national interest. It wasn’t just that Osborn got as far as he did as an independent who mixed his economic populism with a somewhat libertarian approach to many hot-button issues: supporting abortion rights, expressing skepticism about gun control measures, and decrying what he called the “two-party doom loop.” It was that his message connected across lines of partisanship with Nebraska voters who gave Fischer only a 6-point margin, as opposed to Trump’s 20-point win. The 2024 campaign made Osborn well-known across Nebraska and gave him something that is rare for an independent candidate—a statewide network of supporters.
Polls shows that as voters begin to consider their 2026 prospects, Osborn is effectively tied with his Republican rival. “Ricketts is a different kind of candidate. I think the contrast is better [than in the 2024 contest with Fischer],” says Osborn, who argues that the über-wealthy incumbent in this year’s race is the face of what people don’t like about Washington: “the millionaires working for the billionaires and doing their bidding.”
“We’ve seen a migration of wealth since 1980: $50 trillion migrate to the top half percent—the biggest migration of wealth in human history. I talk about that any chance I get, because it’s real,” says Osborn. “And Ricketts signing on for the ‘big, beautiful bill’ just continues that trend. I want to stand with working people and create a level playing field: similar to the way people in 1900 started voting against the candidate who the robber barons were supporting.”
Support independent journalism that does not fall in line
Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets.
Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.
As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war.
In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth.
The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more.
But this journalism is possible only with your support.
This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?
More from The Nation
Celebrate Kristi Noem’s Firing. But Keep Protesting ICE. Celebrate Kristi Noem’s Firing. But Keep Protesting ICE.
Finally, someone in the administration is paying for their cruelty and incompetence.
We Don’t Need an Autopsy to Tell Us the Democrats Failed on Gaza We Don’t Need an Autopsy to Tell Us the Democrats Failed on Gaza
The DNC is allegedly hiding a report showing that Kamala Harris’s Gaza policy helped cost her the 2024 election. But that report won’t tell us anything we don’t already know.
Texas’s Senate Primary Has Already Made History—and It’s Not Over Yet Texas’s Senate Primary Has Already Made History—and It’s Not Over Yet
Democratic nominee James Talarico is getting national media attention, but the real story is sky-high voter turnout, even amid GOP bids to suppress balloting
Quilted Messages Quilted Messages
Sunbonnets carrying not-so-sunny truths.
How the Theatrics of Mamdani’s Trump Meeting Backfired How the Theatrics of Mamdani’s Trump Meeting Backfired
By pandering to the president’s vanity, the New York mayor reinforced Trump’s image as a strongman commanding deference—an especially bad look on the eve of Trump’s war with Iran
Students in New York Are Going Hungry. How Can Mamdani Help? Students in New York Are Going Hungry. How Can Mamdani Help?
With plans for city-owned grocery stores and a focus on affordability, the new mayoral administration offers fresh hopes of successfully confronting the food crisis among students...
