Politics / July 3, 2025

Republicans Just Voted to Do Immoral and Irreparable Harm to the United States

The GOP chose to betray both morality and economic common sense by approving Trump’s one big, ugly bill.

John Nichols
Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La., surrounded by Republican members of Congress, signs President Donald Trump's signature bill of tax breaks and spending cuts, Thursday, July 3, 2025, at the Capitol in Washington.

Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA), surrounded by Republican members of Congress, signs President Donald Trump’s signature bill of tax breaks and spending cuts at the Capitol, July 3, 2025.

(Julia Demaree Nikhinson / AP)

During the tortured final congressional debate before the US House of Representatives approved the legislative monstrosity that Donald Trump dubbed “the one big, beautiful bill”—and that detractors have more accurately described as “the one big ugly bill”—US Representative Don Beyer delivered a moment of moral clarity.

“From the Gospel of Matthew,” began the Virginia Democrat, who read aloud from the floor of the House:

I was thirsty, and you gave me drink.

I was a stranger, and you took me in.

I was naked, and you clothed me.

I was sick, and you visited me.

I was in prison, and you came unto me.

Inasmuch as you have done it unto one of the least of my brothers, you have done it unto me.

When he had finished the biblical reading, Beyer said, “Mr. Speaker, the bill before us takes food and drink from the mouths of the poor. It takes healthcare from the sick. A vote for this bill betrays these Gospel teachings, and in our hearts all of us know it.”

Beyer was right. Every member of Congress, be they liberal or conservative, Democratic or Republican, knew that the bill, which was ultimately approved on Thursday by a 218–214 vote, was written in a way that would:

The Nation Weekly

Fridays. A weekly digest of the best of our coverage.
By signing up, you confirm that you are over the age of 16 and agree to receive occasional promotional offers for programs that support The Nation’s journalism. You may unsubscribe or adjust your preferences at any time. You can read our Privacy Policy here.

The Trump administration’s primary domestic policy scheme was unanimously opposed by both House and Senate Democrats, who recognized the moral and practical disaster that will unfold thanks to the legislation. It was supported by the vast majority of Republicans in the Senate—where Vice President JD Vance broke a 50–50 tie vote—and in the House, where all but two GOP members, who often preach about morality, put aside their consciences in order to do Trump’s bidding.

Congressional Republicans did their best to make the debate about everything but what was in the bill. They did not want to face the moral implications of what they were doing to the least of their brothers and sisters. But the truth was unavoidable. Twenty American Catholic bishops and leaders of the Sisters of Mercy community of Roman Catholic women joined Lutheran, Episcopalian, Presbyterian, Baptist, African Methodist Episcopal Church, Muslim, and Jewish faith leaders in signing a letter to members of Congress that warned about the ways in which the measure targets asylum-seekers and refugees—and the faith communities that serve them—by causing chaos and by driving the working poor deeper into poverty.

“According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the bill transfers wealth from those in the bottom 10 percent of income to those in the top 10 percent of income in our nation, increasing the already large gap between the rich and the poor,” explained the His Eminence Cardinal Robert W. McElroy, Archbishop of Washington, DC, and other religious leaders, who added, “From our various faith perspectives, the moral test of a nation is how it treats those most in need of support. In our view, this legislation will harm the poor and vulnerable in our nation, to the detriment of the common good.”

John Nichols

John Nichols is the executive editor of The Nation. He previously served as the magazine’s national affairs correspondent and Washington correspondent. Nichols has written, cowritten, or edited over a dozen books on topics ranging from histories of American socialism and the Democratic Party to analyses of US and global media systems. His latest, cowritten with Senator Bernie Sanders, is the New York Times bestseller It's OK to Be Angry About Capitalism.

More from The Nation

Gunboat Diplomacy

Gunboat Diplomacy Gunboat Diplomacy

Endless lies about Trump’s endless war.

OppArt / Eric Drooker

A New Theory of John Roberts’s Jurisprudence

A New Theory of John Roberts’s Jurisprudence A New Theory of John Roberts’s Jurisprudence

In this week’s Elie v. U.S., our justice correspondent explains why he thinks Roberts rules the way he does. Plus: Elie mourns the end of summer—and the world.

Elie Mystal

Who's a Good Nazi?

Who's a Good Nazi? Who's a Good Nazi?

Two Liams.

Steve Brodner

The Humans Will Not Replace Us?

The Humans Will Not Replace Us? The Humans Will Not Replace Us?

AI’s existential threat to our future.

OppArt / Peter Kuper

The Shadowy Powers that Trump Could Use to End American Democracy

The Shadowy Powers that Trump Could Use to End American Democracy The Shadowy Powers that Trump Could Use to End American Democracy

Two Washington insiders are sounding the alarm about what could happen if Trump activates the top-secret Presidential Emergency Action Documents.

Column / Sasha Abramsky

Hasan Piker and the Democrats’ Edgelord Dilemma

Hasan Piker and the Democrats’ Edgelord Dilemma Hasan Piker and the Democrats’ Edgelord Dilemma

The gaming streamer has become a big headache for Michigan US Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed—but that’s the risk of targeting a campaign at younger, terminally online voters.

Ben Schwartz