The 24-Hour Rise and Fall of Nikki Haley
The national media’s search for a big new political “narrative” creates flash stories that ignore the larger context.

Lucky Nikki Haley! Emerging as the strongest second-tier Republican presidential candidate (though still behind Donald Trump nationally and in the early primary states), the former South Carolina governor starred in Wednesday’s Politico Playbook, a newsletter that everyone in national politics seems to read.. Its top item hailed “Haley’s Comet” and featured no fewer than three major national features charting her rise, including in The New York Times. Her new strength is most notable in New Hampshire, where she has surged into second place with 29 percent of the primary vote (but still behind Trump at 45). She has “pep in her step” since getting popular New Hampshire Governor Chris Sununu’s endorsement, the Playbook noted.
Poor Nikki Haley! Just 24 hours later, she starred in Thursday’s Playbook again, only this time the headline was “Nikki Haley’s moment of crisis.” As my colleague Chris Lehmann reported, she thoroughly botched an answer to a softball question from a New Hampshire voter on Wednesday about what caused the Civil War. “I mean, I think the cause of the Civil War was basically how government was going to run the freedoms and what people could and couldn’t do,” she began. “Run the freedoms”? No mention of whose freedoms.
More word salad ensued. The New Hampshire voter said it was “astonishing” that she never mentioned slavery.
“What do you want me to say about slavery?” Haley shot back. Then she took an unrelated question.
Haley’s answer surprised our leading national media. But why? As the ex-governor of the slave state that was the first to secede from the union, Haley has always straddled this issue, weirdly, but mostly coming down on the side of the former Confederacy and its modern-day proponents. Though she’s of Indian descent and “of color” as our current categories go, she has often sounded like a nostalgic Southern booster of the supposedly noble “Lost Cause.” Running for governor in 2010, she told the Sons of Confederate Veterans that she would always promote the notion that the Confederate flag was “about the heritage and…this is not something that is racist.” That same year, she also wrote slavery out of the story, describing the Civil War “as two sides fighting for different values, one for ‘tradition,’ and one for ‘change.’” Ah, tradition.
Haley might not have hurt herself with Trump’s base; maybe she helped herself. But her slavery gaffe probably did hurt her the media and anti-Trump Republicans just as she was gaining the mantle of the strongest number-two behind Trump. She tarnished her image as a smart, comparatively moderate, likable woman of color who might appeal to other women and independent voters. In 2015 she got points when, after resisting the move for years, she ordered the Confederate flag removed from atop the capitol, after white supremacist Dylann Roof murdered nine Black churchgoers who’d welcomed him to their Wednesday prayer meeting.
But if any of those potential Republican primary voters were watching, they have to ask: That lady gave that answer about slavery?
Political coverage, sadly, is too often driven by “the narrative:” the story about a candidate or campaign that takes off from a reliable fact, connects it to not so reliable facts, and somehow becomes an irrefutable nostrum. Joe Biden is too old, voters say. Trump supporters don’t care about the 91 felony counts against him. The economy is improving dramatically, but (obscure) $16 McDonalds meals mean people won’t give Biden any credit for rising wages, overall falling prices, and the lowest unemployment rate in decades.
Some narratives carry for months, turning into momentum for the storied candidates. And some don’t last 24 hours.
On a day-to-day basis, and arguably beyond, Politico Playbook sets the prevailing politics narrative. Often Playbook’s reporting is good, its “narrative” sometimes convincing and durable. The 24-hour “Haley’s Comet” storyline: Not so much.
Haley’s one-day undoing spotlights the problem with the media’s desperate effort to anoint an anti-Trump Republican. Early on, it was supposed to be Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, but the misanthropic trigger-happy culture warrior has sunk in primary polls as actual voters get to know him. Now, they’re promoting Haley. She’s been a sharp debater, probably winning each of those dull slugfests (which Trump won’t dignify by attending), but little else makes her stand out as a potential president, let alone a Trump-slayer. In fact, her slavery flub undercuts her reputation for being fast on her feet.
Beyond that, she’s a foreign policy hawk in a party whose base has largely turned against US military intervention. On domestic issues, Haley is a jumble of terrible policy ideas, including Social Security and Medicare cuts, as well as politically expedient, sometimes hopelessly irreconcilable, focus-grouped answers on issues from abortion—she wants “consensus,” but would sign a six-week ban if it crossed her desk—to, in this hopeless case, what caused the Civil War. Most times she’s been asked, she’s gotten that particular question wrong. National reporters should know that.
By the way, it took Haley until 9 am on Thursday to correct her answer. “Of course the Civil War was about slavery, that’s the easy part,” Haley told the radio show The Pulse of New Hampshire. (Correction: Slavery was not “the easy part,” Nikki.) “But more than that, what’s the lesson in all this? That freedom matters. And individual rights and liberties matter for all people. That’s the blessing of America. That was a stain on America when we had slavery. But what we want is never relive it. Never let anyone take those freedoms away again.”
Popular
“swipe left below to view more authors”Swipe →Still a lot of pabulum, but it probably would have been an acceptable answer on Wednesday. On Thursday, it just heightened her embarrassment. And that continued into the night and over to Friday.
“I’m a seventh generation Mississippian named for [Confederate General] Jeb Stuart,” former Mitt Romney adviser Stuart Stevens tweeted Thursday night. “Nikki Haley is repeating the essence of the ‘Lost Cause’ myth. To say this in 2023 is extraordinary. It’s disqualifying.”
Former New Jersey governor Chris Christie was kinder, trashing Haley with affectionate condescension. “She didn’t say what she said about this because she’s dumb. She’s not, she’s smart, and she knows better. And she didn’t say it because she’s a racist. Because she’s not. I know her well, and I don’t believe Nikki has a racist bone in her body.… She did it because she’s unwilling to offend anyone by telling the truth,” Christie said. One thing is clear: Haley’s slavery stumble has put pep in Christie’s step, and he’s far less likely to drop out of the race before the New Hampshire primary than he was even two days ago.
On Friday, she was cleaning up her mess again on New Hampshire radio, solemnly telling the host, “If you were born in the South, you’ve lived with the idea of slavery all your life,” which is a weird flex; merely the idea? Not the horror, the cruelty, the aftermath of institutional racism, Jim Crow? And then she went on to “Lost Cause” it again, insisting it was about “more than [slavery], it was about the role of government and individual rights.”
The 24-hour flash of “Haley’s Comet” shows how desperate our national media are for a big new political “narrative” and how badly they botch informed reporting when they try to create one. This holiday week, Haley’s slavery stumbles were the big story, on cable and online. Nevertheless, we’re likely to see more flashes of Haley in the weeks to come. In fact, Politico reported Thursday night that New Hampshire voters “seem poised to give Nikki Haley a pass” on her slavery idiocy.
It makes a certain kind of sense. For anti-Trump Republicans and the media, Haley’s all they’ve got as they work to ignore reality: that Donald Trump will be the 2024 Republican nominee and our democracy is in grave danger.
Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation
Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.
We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.
In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen.
Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering.
With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now.
While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account.
I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.
Onward,
Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and publisher, The Nation
More from The Nation
The Supreme Court Has a Serial Killer Problem The Supreme Court Has a Serial Killer Problem
In this week's Elie v. U.S., The Nation’s justice correspondent recaps a major death penalty case that came before the high court as well as the shenanigans of a man who’s angling...
Corporate Democrats Are Foolishly Surrendering the AI Fight Corporate Democrats Are Foolishly Surrendering the AI Fight
Voters want the party to get tough on the industry. But Democratic leaders are following the money instead.
Marching Against a Corrupt Regime Marching Against a Corrupt Regime
People taking to the streets for democracy.
It Would Be Madness to Give Trump and His Toadies Even More Power It Would Be Madness to Give Trump and His Toadies Even More Power
And yet, that’s what the Supreme Court appears prepared to do.
Trump Is Dragging Republicans to Crushing Defeat After Crushing Defeat Trump Is Dragging Republicans to Crushing Defeat After Crushing Defeat
The president is deeply unpopular, his policies are failing, and Republicans are losing—everywhere.
