Putin at the UN

Putin at the UN

Russian leader asks, will the US rethink its destructive, “revolutionary” role in the world?

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Nation contributing editor Stephen F. Cohen and John Batchelor continue their weekly discussions of the new Cold War. This installment focuses on the speeches given at the UN by Presidents Obama and Putin on September 28 and on their private meeting. Cohen points out that the two speeches spelled out with considerable candor and clarity the very different and conflicting international thinking in Washington and Moscow. US policies in various parts of the world, from the Middle East to Ukraine, have been driven by a regime-change agenda in the name of democracy and a better life for those regions, a perspective reiterated in Obama’s speech. Putin replied that those US policies have resulted only in greater tyranny and more human misery, as evidenced by the march of ISIS through Iraq and Syria. Cohen asks, can Washington rethink its policies and can Russia ever be right?

If so, this may be the moment for such rethinking in Washington. Obama’s decision to meet privately with Putin was tacit admission that two of the White House’s major foreign policies have failed: the attempt to stop ISIS through a US-led military campaign; and the even longer policy of “isolating Putin’s Russia.” Various related issues are also discussed in this installment, including Putin’s proposal for a US-Russian “coalition” against ISIS akin to the US-Soviet alliance against Hitler’s Germany in World War II.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x