Introducing the New TheNation.com

Introducing the New TheNation.com

One hundred fifty years ago, The Nation published its first issue. Today, we launch a new site for the next generation of readers.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

I started as a Nation intern 18 years ago, and so I remember the days when the magazine lived and breathed in a print-based world. In 1997, our website, still in beta release, consisted of a few “About Us” pages and a couple of pieces from the magazine that we’d post once a week. To indicate that this was all very cutting edge, we stuck a lightning bolt next to the nameplate.

Back then, writing for the magazine was a comparatively monastic experience. You’d work for weeks on an article, defend its arguments against vigorous but loving critiques from the editors, and gratefully accept changes from fact-checkers and copy editors. Finally, the issue would ship to the printer. And then: the vast silence. If you were lucky, a few weeks later, someone might approach you at a party and say how much they liked (or hated) your piece. Some letters from impassioned subscribers would eventually come in via the Postal Service, but encounters with actual readers were rare and cherished events.

We continue to publish the print magazine under these rigorous standards, and it will remain an essential part of our identity, offering readers a considered and curated take on matters of critical interest. The digital revolution, however, has allowed us to connect to vastly more people, and to get to know them better. Today, The Nation publishes about 70 articles a week online, which go out to more than 420,000 Twitter followers, almost 290,000 Facebook fans, and 200,000 e-mail subscribers. And believe me, we always hear back from you—in comment threads, e-mails, tweetbacks, Facebook messages, shares, pins, and likes. Analytic tools allow us to see what’s being read and shared in real time, and to hazard educated guesses why.

All this data can be overwhelming and, for some publications, even dispiriting. It’s become an industry cliché to lament how the Internet rewards content mills that churn out the equivalent of digital fast food. But here at The Nation, the exact opposite has proved true: The more we learn about our readers, the more inspired we are to create great journalism for them. Last year, for example, the most-read articles at The Nation included probing long-form reports on the crisis in Ukraine, Israel’s siege of Gaza, the state of online feminism, the impunity of brutal policing, and the corrosive effect of lobbyists on American politics. The digital revolution has empowered our single greatest asset—The Nation’s readers—and you’ve responded by sharing our best work with millions of new readers every month.

That’s why, on July 6, 2015—exactly 150 years after the publication of our first issue—we’re relaunching TheNation.com. The new site, created in partnership with our friends at Blue State Digital and Diaspark, represents our commitment to being at the forefront of independent journalism for the next generation. The article page is designed with the Nation ambassador in mind: Beautiful, clear fonts (Mercury and Knockout) and a variety of image fields make the articles a joy to read—on desktop, tablet, and mobile. Prominent share tools, Twitter quotes, and a “highlight to e-mail/tweet” function make it easy to share them with others. A robust new taxonomy and a continuous scroll seamlessly connect readers to related content. You’ll also see color-coded touts that let readers take action on a particular issue, or donate and subscribe to The Nation.

Meanwhile, the home page doubles down on The Nation’s identity as a magazine of ideas and values. A variety of full- and half-width modules allows us to showcase not just today’s top stories, but the depth of our coverage and archive. Related pieces will be grouped together to help readers understand the political and historical context of today’s crises. You might find, for example, an editorial calling on candidates to refuse to accept money from fossil-fuel companies paired with groundbreaking essays by Naomi Klein and Chris Hayes, along with a petition cosponsored by our friends at 350 Action. Overall, the site blends a sense of urgency and timeliness with the provocative and prescient writing that is The Nation’s hallmark.

You’ll notice a few more changes as well. For the next few months, there’s no paywall: All of our articles will be free to everyone—our gift to you in The Nation’s 150th-anniversary year. Later, we’ll introduce a metered system that continues to put The Nation in front of new readers, but also asks our regular visitors to contribute to the cost of independent journalism. Finally, only subscribers will be able to leave comments—and they’ll be asked to identify themselves with a first and last name. We realize this will be controversial to some, but keeping the comments free of trolls and bots has taken an increasing amount of effort. We think it’s only fair that commenters stand by what they write, and give something to the community in return.

I think I speak for everyone on the digital team when I say that building the new website—a yearlong endeavor—was an absolute pleasure and privilege. We hope you enjoy it—and, of course, we know you’ll let us know what you think!

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x