How Saving the Environment Could Fix the Economy

How Saving the Environment Could Fix the Economy

How Saving the Environment Could Fix the Economy

Why not revive New Deal policies but apply them in a green and global fashion?

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

This article is part of The Nation’s 150th Anniversary Special Issue. Download a free PDF of the issue, with articles by James Baldwin, Barbara Ehrenreich, Toni Morrison, Howard Zinn and many more, here.

Excerpted from the February 1, 1999 Issue

Environmentalism has been one of the ascendant social forces of the twentieth century, but it will not succeed in the twenty-first century if it does not deliver economic well-being as well as ecosystem salvation. To many, this seems an impossible task. But repairing our ravaged environment could become one of the biggest economic enterprises of the coming century, a huge source of jobs, profits and general economic well-being.

One model is the New Deal that President Franklin Roosevelt launched in the thirties to propel the US economy out of depression. After all, today’s economic problems are strikingly similar to those of the thirties: instability, inequality, overcapacity—too much money at the top and too little at the bottom to generate enough demand to keep the system churning forward. The basic function of the New Deal was to restore demand to the economy by, among other measures, guaranteeing workers a minimum wage and putting the unemployed to work in government-funded public works projects.

Why not revive those New Deal policies but apply them in a green and global fashion? The program could be called the Global Green Deal. Will this cost money? Without question. But there is lots of money available; we’re just spending it foolishly now. In the United States military spending remains at bloated, cold war levels nearly ten years after the Berlin wall fell. Amid such excess, even a minor redeployment of resources can yield large gains.

A Global Green Deal that put people to work restoring our ravaged environment would yield enormous economic and social benefits to the vast majority of the earth’s inhabitants, to say nothing of their descendants. Such a fundamental shift in direction will not happen by itself, however. FDR pushed the New Deal because millions of unemployed people were in the streets, just as Richard Nixon got out of Vietnam because Americans of all stripes were opposing the war. It’s time to confront our next President with similar pressure on behalf of a Global Green Deal.

Mark Hertsgaard, The Nation’s environment correspondent, has been contributing since 1984. He is the author of HOT: Living Through the Next Fifty Years on Earth (2011). 

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read, just one of the many incisive, deeply-reported articles we publish daily. Now more than ever, we need fearless journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media.

Throughout this critical election year and a time of media austerity and renewed campus activism and rising labor organizing, independent journalism that gets to the heart of the matter is more critical than ever before. Donate right now and help us hold the powerful accountable, shine a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug, and build a more just and equitable future.

For nearly 160 years, The Nation has stood for truth, justice, and moral clarity. As a reader-supported publication, we are not beholden to the whims of advertisers or a corporate owner. But it does take financial resources to report on stories that may take weeks or months to properly investigate, thoroughly edit and fact-check articles, and get our stories into the hands of readers.

Donate today and stand with us for a better future. Thank you for being a supporter of independent journalism.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x