1905–1915: Henry James’s Obscurities

1905–1915: Henry James’s Obscurities

1905–1915: Henry James’s Obscurities

To get the story you must pay the price.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

This article is part of The Nation’s 150th Anniversary Special Issue. Download a free PDF of the issue, with articles by James Baldwin, Barbara Ehrenreich, Toni Morrison, Howard Zinn and many more, here.

Too Much and Too Little

Annie R.M. Logan
January 26, 1905

The story contained in The Golden Bowl is elaborately concealed. It is involved, swathed, smothered in many obscurities, obscurities inseparable from the author’s method of presenting an inside and outside and all-round view; obscurities arising from excessive use of extended metaphor, from saying too much and saying too little, even from sentences too complex and too elliptical, too long and too short. To get the story you must pay the price, must attack and overcome the obscurities; and whether this be done in a spirit of happy satisfaction of delight in the obscurities for their own sake, or of irritation, or of mere plodding determination to stick and pull through, in the end you have your reward—a story, a situation, which, as you think about it, pierces the obscurities and strikes you in the eyes, like the low red autumn sun pushing out of a mass of black clouds.

It is a story short and bitter. No one but Mr. James could tell it in English without grossness and vulgarity, without challenging our prejudices and prepossessions, without making us all out to be, in his estimate, not better than the French—a state of things we should have to have forced upon our notice. And he doesn’t literally tell the story; he only examines witnesses, comments on testimony, infers and speculates prodigiously, leaving us free to make what we can of the case, to grasp or miss its facts and its wide significance, according to our capacity for independent mental operations. To rehearse the facts is perhaps the most useful part a reviewer can play between Mr. James and the public. The facts at the bottom of The Golden Bowl glare when you have found them.

Annie R.M. Logan (1851–1933) wrote well over 100 reviews in The Nation between 1884 and 1906. Born in New Brunswick, she spent most of her adult life in Montreal. 

* * *

The Negro Problem

Oswald Garrison Villard
February 18, 1909

* * *

Encounter: Simeon Strunsky and Richard Kreitner

Muckraking the Fathers

Simeon Strunsky
January 21, 1915

Twilight of the Idols

Richard Kreitner
April 6, 2015

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x