February 13, 1990: Agreement Is Reached on a Plan to Reunify Germany

February 13, 1990: Agreement Is Reached on a Plan to Reunify Germany

February 13, 1990: Agreement Is Reached on a Plan to Reunify Germany

The new Germany, The Nation said, ought not to become yet another “bully on the block.”

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

The fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 began a process that led to German reunification. On this date in 1990, an agreement was reached between the two Germanys and four outside powers, including the United States, on what that process would look like. In an editorial titled “The Newest Superpower” (March 12, 1990), The Nation feared the potential that a reunified Germany would be able to improperly throw its weight around in Europe, as, in fact, it has done.

It’s true that there is no stopping German unification, nor should there be. Germans, no less than Lithuanians, South Africans, Palestinians or Quebecois, have a right to political and social self-determination that is based on international law and equity. But an increasingly interdependent, and vulnerable, world community has the responsibility to see that the process of self-determination is as free and fair as possible, and that the consequences do not imperil the peace. Those duties are political in nature, and usually highly ambiguous. One person’s “free and fair” formula is another’s stacked deck, and peace is always conditional. In the case of the two Germanys, self-determination is likely to lead to the creation of a bona fide superpower with the ability, and maybe the will, to throw its weight around in a way that deprives others of fully autonomous self-rule. That is what superpowers do, whether they are American, Soviet or, in the old days, British, French or Dutch. It’s bigoted to believe that the Germans, because of some volkisch character quirk, are more prone to the abuse of super power than anyone else. History holds too many nightmares all around. But it is only realistic, and now imperative, for those who still have some say in the matter to devise democratic structures that may keep new superpowers in check. Imagine how much better the world would be if the United States had been more bridled in its arrogant exploitation of power for the past forty-five years. President Gorbachev has the right idea with his plan for an all-European effort to contain the Continent’s nascent titan. Such a project must entail the transformation of NATO and the Warsaw Pact into a new community that will protect boundaries, safeguard minorities and vanquish fears of any bully on the block.

February 13, 1990

To mark The Nation’s 150th anniversary, every morning this year The Almanac will highlight something that happened that day in history and how The Nation covered it. Get The Almanac every day (or every week) by signing up to the e-mail newsletter.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x