Why the Jobs Report Isn’t All Good

Why the Jobs Report Isn’t All Good

One survey says job numbers are up, and another one says job numbers are down. Which one is correct?

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

The Labor Department released two job surveys Friday morning, and one of them has unambiguously good news: the monthly survey of businesses said the economy added 288,000 jobs in April, beating expectations by a considerable margin and representing one of the highest monthly totals since the 2008 crash. Steve Benen has the chart:

That’s reason to celebrate, and many people—particularly Democratic partisans with an eye on the midterm elections—are doing just that. But the household survey, also released Friday morning, painted a grim picture. It showed the economy actually lost 73,000 jobs. How can one survey say the economy added jobs, while another said jobs were lost? Well, because one of them is wrong, as David Leonhardt notes. They can’t both be true.

Since the household survey has a smaller sample, it’s tempting to give it less weight. But really, one should not draw any firm conclusions until all the data is marching to the same beat—and over a period of months, not in one single snapshot. “The weak household survey hugely dampens the enthusiasm of the strong payroll numbers,” said Heidi Shierholz of the Economic Policy Institute. “We can’t be confident that the economy is entering a new stage of stronger job growth until both surveys are regularly posting strong gains, and that did not happen in April.”

And disturbing fundamentals still abound. The employment rate’s substantial drop from 6.7 percent in March to 6.3 percent in April was due entirely to people leaving the work force, according to the household survey. The overall labor force participation rate fell to its lowest point of the recovery.

While quite a bit of these “missing workers” are baby boomers who retired, about half are of prime working age. In other words, these are people who simply stopped looking for work. The Economic Policy Institute has been tracking who, exactly, these missing workers are:

If those people were still looking for work, the unemployment rate would be a staggering 9.9 percent. Again, some of those missing workers are rightfully retired, but millions are not. That people are giving up hope in large enough numbers to drive down the “official” unemployment rate isn’t good news. The economic outlook, simply put, remains cloudy at best and dark at worst.

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Huevel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x