Life, Death and Accountability in Anaheim

Life, Death and Accountability in Anaheim

Life, Death and Accountability in Anaheim

Another white officer is absolved in the killing of an unarmed Latino man.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email


A tribute to Manuel Angel Diaz. (Gabriel San Román, OC Weekly)

Twenty-five-year-old Manuel Diaz was hanging out in Anaheim on a sunny Saturday last July when two officers began to approach him. Diaz ran off, and Anaheim police officers Nick Bennallack and Brett Heitman pursued him. Moments later, Bennallack shot and killed Diaz—who was unarmed—on an apartment complex lawn. This week, the Orange County District Attorney’s office ruled that the shooting was justified.

Video taken immediately after the shooting is chilling. One bystander frustratingly screams out, “He’s still alive! Call the cops!” Officers on the scene appear confused and frantic, and eager to push back the growing crowd—but never once check Diaz’s vitals. Another bystander’s voice is heard in Spanish, encouraging witnesses to capture what’s happening on video by reminding them that “The law allows you to tape [officers].”

That video sparked outrage last year, as residents took to the streets in protest. Those demonstrations were met with increasing violence from Anaheim police—who used K9 dogs and fired beanbag bullets at dangerously short ranges against not only men and women, but against toddlers as well.

Anaheim is not alone. Coast to coast, there’s a predictable pattern of deadly police violence against young people (usually young men) of color, followed by community outrage, and then followed by deplorable police repression. Those are the short-term stages, which conclude with a later decision to absolve the officers involved of any wrong doing—leaving an already disheartened community with permanent disappointment.

Such is the case unraveling in Brooklyn, where 16-year-old Kimani Gray was killed earlier this month by New York plainclothes police officers in East Flatbush. Writing for Ebony, Rosa Clemente recently wondered whether we’re using the right terms when we talk about this specific kind of violence: “Kimani’s killing is not just a case of police brutality, it is yet another example of the ongoing human rights violations against mostly Black and Latino/a young people in New York and cities across the country.” She’s right—“brutality” hardly begins to capture the violation of the fundamental entitlement to life that we should all enjoy. Clemente concludes that while political leaders are quick to recognize human rights violations in other countries, they rarely recognize violations at home—particularly in communities of color.

We’ve come to largely accept the fact that some young people of color will inevitably be shot and killed with impunity. We’ve also come to accept that a community’s outrage in the aftermath of such killings will be quelled with unbelievable force—in Anaheim, camouflage-clad SWAT teams paraded the streets and intimidated protestors, while police in Brooklyn declared a “frozen zone,” which essentially freezes First Amendment rights.

Back in Anaheim, an essentially segregated city is already grappling with the fact that another white officer has shot and killed another unarmed Latino man, and will not be held accountable for doing so. Sadly, it won’t be the last time.

In New York, police quotas are part and parcel of discriminatory stopping-and-frisking. Listen to The Nations exclusive audio of the police union’s accedence to NYPD quotas.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x