The Big Four

The Big Four

Making crossword music with a squeezebox jam.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

[First, three links:
• The current puzzle
• Our puzzle-solving guidelines
• A Nation-puzzle solver’s blog where you can ask for and offer hints, and where every one of our clues is explained in detail.]

Ask a wordplay aficionado about the “Big Four” and it's possible they’ll know just what you’re talking about: J, Q, X, and Z, the four least commonly used letters in the English alphabet (or to put it another way, the four highest-scoring letters in Scrabble). These are the letters that lend spice and flavor to a crossword grid, keeping it from devolving into a blandly undistinguished mess of E’s and N’s and T’s and S’s.

But the culinary metaphor is a good one, because like spices the Big Four need to be used sparingly for maximum effect. Put too many of them in a grid and the result can be overbearing. The goal, ideally, is to sprinkle just enough unusual letters through a grid so that the solver is pleased by the overall effect without quite being aware why.

As in so many areas of life, the key is moderation, and this is even more true in cryptic crosswords than in standard crosswords, for a couple of reasons. For one thing, a cryptic crossword grid contains fewer letters—about 160, give or take, compared to as many as 190 in a standard crossword of the same dimensions—so distinctive letters stand out more piquantly.

But the more pressing difference is that a cryptic clue is much more sensitive than a standard clue to the particular letters in the word being clued. When it comes to Central American currency, for instance, the Guatemalan quetzal is no harder to clue in a standard crossword than a Nicaraguan peso (it’s much harder to get into the grid in the first place, but that’s another story).

Writing a cryptic clue for QUETZAL, on the other hand, is a headache. The big four letters resist all the usual cryptic techniques—they don’t play well with others in anagrams, they’re hard to disguise, they lend themselves to few obvious abbreviations, and so on.

So we’ve learned to keep them to a minimum. In fact, a look through our records shows that we’ve never yet included a word with more than one of the Big Four: no EQUINOX, no JACUZZI, no QUARTZITE. But here are a few entries we have used that would earn a high score in Scrabble:

AQUA VITAE  Liquor with a drop of absinthe, as six eat up (4,5)
BANJOIST  Prohibit support for Pete Seeger, e.g. (8)
EXPLOSIVE  Volatile former pâtissier originally chopped olives (9)
LAZYBONES  Idler is confused by zeal, son (9)
QUARTET  Tauter “Dancing Queen” is foremost for ABBA, e.g. (7)
WOZNIAK  Tech pioneer: “I know A-Z, but in a different order” (7)

Are there words or clues including the Big Four that you particularly like or dislike? Please share here, along with any quibbles, questions, kudos or complaints about the current puzzle or any previous puzzle. To comment (and see other readers’ comments,) please click on this post’s title and scroll to the bottom of the resulting screen.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x