Amnesty or Border Security?

Amnesty or Border Security?

Washington editor Chris Hayes and Pat Buchanan debate immigration reform.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Morning Joe heats up when Pat Buchanan and The Nation‘s Washington editor Chris Hayes debate immigration reform. Hayes argues that the only solution is comprehensive immigration reform, based on his opinion that immigration will achieve a level of equilibrium based on the labor market. Buchanan argues that the solution is as simple as securing the borders first then going after each business that hires illegal immigrants. But the arguments become less clear-cut when the issue of sanctioned racial profiling comes into play.

"Being in the country illegally is not a crime. It is a civil infraction, it is not a criminal infraction," Hayes explains. "This is an important distinction." Buchanan counters with, "Thanks for the ACLU argument…American people have said very clearly we don’t want a path to citizenship, we don’t want amnesty, we want the laws of the United States enforced. Why is the President of the United States…not enforcing laws?" But Hayes disagrees, arguing that enforcing the borders is impractical. And Buchanan argues that granting amnesty will only entice more illegal immigrants to come.

Host Joe Scarborough summed it up best when he said, "It doesn’t help politically for Democrats to support sending illegal immigrants back, and it doesn’t help Republicans in the long-term to be seen as overly harsh."

–Morgan Ashenfelter

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Huevel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x