Noted

Noted

Aura Bogado on deportations before immigration reform, Greg Mitchell on the Department of Justice and the AP, the editors on advertising legend George Lois

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

THE HUMAN COST OF DC GRIDLOCK: As the Senate Judiciary Committee considers some 300 amendments challenging the nearly 900-page immigration bill crafted by the Gang of Eight, the detention and deportation of undocumented immigrants may continue full force. Advocates are renewing their call on President Obama to issue an executive order suspending deportations of people who would gain status in the bill’s final version later this year.

The detention and deportation of undocumented immigrants often gets lost in the numbers rather than highlighted as individual stories—and some advocates say that’s part of the problem. Pablo Alvarado, who heads the National Day Laborer Organizing Network (NDLON), says that when immigration is debated at the Capitol, it gets divorced from what’s happening to communities on the ground. “Suspended deportations would ground the debate in reality,” Alvarado says.

That reality is typified by people like Carmen Yvette Martinez, who was driving with her husband, Roger Tabora Martinez, in Massachusetts in February when they were pulled over. The police officer informed them that he believed there was a warrant on the car. When Carmen, a US citizen, tried to explain that the car was in her name and there was no warrant, the officer asked both husband and wife to show some ID and then began to inquire about their immigration status. Upon learning that Roger was undocumented, the officer arrested him. Although he has no criminal record and helps to support his wife and stepson, Roger was held in immigrant detention for nearly three months before being deported to Honduras because of an immigration order stemming from nearly a decade ago.

Under the bipartisan immigration proposal, Roger would be eligible to apply for relief and gain provisional status as he started a thirteen-year journey toward finally becoming a US citizen. But Congress’s slow pace meant that he was simply deported instead. His wife says that she became a single mom overnight, and that both she and her son have been deeply affected by Roger’s deportation. “It doesn’t make any sense to take away a good person,” Carmen adds. “I don’t want any other family to go through what we have.”

Stories like Carmen and Roger’s appear on a website that went live in April tracking deportation cases. Fourteen of the featured cases are ongoing; six have resulted in a stay, and four have resulted in deportation. The NDLON, along with the AFL-CIO, MALDEF and United We Dream, is also asking people who represent organizations invested in immigration reform to sign a petition on the site to urge President Obama to suspend the deportations.

To read more on the human costs of inaction on immigration reform, visit TheNation.com.   AURA BOGADO

FREEDOM OF THE PRESS? The news published on May 13 that the Justice Department secretly spied on journalists working at the Associated Press came as a shock at first. The DOJ obtained telephone records for more than twenty separate telephone lines, which the AP described as “unprecedented” and an “extraordinary action.” But as many others have pointed out, this is part of a clear pattern: the Obama administration has aggressively gone after leakers and brought six cases against whistleblowers, more than all previous presidents combined.

For veterans of the industry, the DOJ’s actions are indefensible. AP president and CEO Gary Pruitt wrote a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder calling the spying “a serious interference with AP’s constitutional rights to gather and report the news.” Longtime AP executive editor Kathleen Carroll told MSNBC that in her more than thirty years in journalism, neither she nor the First Amendment lawyers she works with “have ever seen anything like this.” The Newspaper Association of America, a leading trade group, declared: “These actions shock the American conscience and violate the critical freedom of the press protected by the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.”

Early speculation about why the AP was targeted centered on a scoop from last May about a foiled terror plot in Yemen, which involved plans to blow up an airliner bound for the United States. The White House said it had no involvement in the DOJ’s actions at all, and others on social media defended the administration, speculating that the surveillance must have been handled through proper channels.

But the Electronic Frontier Foundation released a statement in response to these claims. “It is disturbing enough that the government appears to have violated its own regulations for subpoenas to the news media. However, this revelation also shows that we have a severe problem in protecting the privacy of our communications,” the EFF said. “It is critical to update our privacy laws and our understanding of the Constitution, and reflect the realities of what law enforcement can determine from our records and other metadata about our communications stored with our communications providers, be they phone companies, ISPs or social networks.”   GREG MITCHELL

THE NATION’S OWN MAD MAN: The Nation congratulates our friend George Lois, the recent winner of a CLIO Lifetime Achievement Award—the advertising world’s equivalent of the lifetime achievement Oscar.

Lois, described by The New York Times as the “agent provocateur” who “triggered advertising’s Creative Revolution of the 1960s,” is known for his rebellious, provocative, iconoclastic and often stridently political work. Widely regarded as one of the original Mad Men, Lois conceived the hugely successful “I Want My MTV” campaign, as well as celebrated advertising campaigns for clients ranging from Xerox to Robert F. Kennedy to Tommy Hilfiger. Half of his more than ninety famous covers for Esquire have been installed in the permanent collection of the Museum of Modern Art in New York City. One of them, depicting the draft-resisting Muhammad Ali as a martyred St. Sebastian, became one of the most iconic political images of its time.

Lois is also a longtime Nation subscriber and a deeply committed progressive. He conceived The Nation’s “Timeless Whoppers” campaign, which appears on page 16 of this (and every) issue. Hats off to our good friend and ally!

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x