Quantcast

What's Really Behind Obama's Praise of Ray Kelly? | The Nation

  •  

What's Really Behind Obama's Praise of Ray Kelly?

  • Share
  • Decrease text size Increase text size


New York Police Commissioner Ray Kelly. (AP Photo/Frank Franklin II)

When President Obama interrupted a regularly scheduled press briefing to acknowledge the collective pain and anger over the acquittal of George Zimmerman, his heartfelt testament to his own experience of racial profiling wrote a page in the history books. Yet, as many would quickly point out, his commitment to addressing racial profiling rang hollow in the shadow of comments he had made just days before, praising New York Police Commissioner Ray Kelly as an “outstanding” and “very well qualified” potential candidate to lead the Department of Homeland Security after Janet Napolitano steps down.

About the Author

Jeanne Theoharis
Jeanne Theoharis, a professor of political science at the City University of New York’s Brooklyn College, is the...
Amna Akbar
Amna Akbar is Visiting Assistant Professor at The Ohio State University, Moritz College of Law. Her writing and...

Also by the Author

Also by the Author

As the government embraces a “counter-radicalization” approach to counterterrorism, prosecutors are turning radical beliefs into criminal acts.

In the last year, Kelly has come under escalating public criticism: the NYPD faces five federal lawsuits challenging its stop-and-frisk and Muslim surveillance programs and two City Council bills banning racial profiling and establishing independent oversight over the department. Noticeably “flattered” by the president’s burnishing his increasingly troubled public profile, Kelly went media stumping, heightening speculation that the police chief may be a contender. Whether Kelly is picked as the next secretary or not, President Obama countenanced Kelly’s profiling tactics, and even more sobering, revealed his own cards.

Obama’s vocal support for Kelly is not the contradiction it may have seemed. While stop-and-frisk and Muslim surveillance are hallmarks of the Kelly decade in New York, Obama has built a presidency of ever-expanding executive power and secrecy—a powerful brew that has regularized racial profiling on a sweeping scale.

Kelly’s policing of New York bears an eerie resemblance to Obama’s national law enforcement record. Under Kelly, the NYPD has stop-and-frisked a record number of people, reaching an all-time high in 2011 of 685,724 stops (in contrast to fewer than 100,000 in 2002). Of those stopped, 84 percent in 2011 were black and Latino. While the department claims that stop-and-frisk is a tool for crime-fighting and public safety, only 2 percent of stops resulted in the discovery of contraband, and only 6 percent resulted in arrests. Kelly made clear in defending the program to state officials that his purpose is to instill in African-American and Latino communities a deep fear and vulnerability when it comes to the police. The stop-and-frisk policy sends a message to New York City’s communities of color, young men in particular: you are all suspects, and there is no place you should feel safe.

In yet another program developed under the guise of prevention, the department transformed itself into a formidable intelligence agency. The NYPD Intelligence Division indiscriminately spied on Muslim communities and Muslim student associations in New York City, Long Island and throughout the Northeast. In so doing, the NYPD put to use its own 2007 report on radicalization, which correlates increasing religiosity and politicization in Muslims with the potential for terrorism. So the NYPD went whitewater rafting with City College students, worried about “militant paintball trips” at Brooklyn College, and sent undercover operatives to take notes at mosques and ask questions at “ethnic hot spots” like restaurants and bookstores. Despite Kelly’s fierce defense of the program’s necessity, the department admitted that not a single prosecution has resulted out of this wall-to-wall surveillance. Like the stop-and-frisk program, these programs instill fear. Muslim communities have reported decreased mosque attendance, reluctance to engage in “[p]olitical organizing, civil engagement and activism,” and “self-censorship on many religious and political topics.” Kelly’s version of security means no space is sacred, or free of watch, for New York’s Muslims. The message sent to Muslims: you are all suspects, and there is no place you should feel safe.

Obama’s record bears an uncomfortable similarity to Kelly’s. Over the past five years, Obama’s administration has expanded the footprint of racialized and unchecked criminal justice, similarly under the guise of prevention and security. Though he claimed in the press room that “law enforcement is traditionally done at the state and local levels, not at the federal levels,” Obama’s presidency has been marked by the expanded use of federal power and prosecutorial overreach. In the name of national security, Obama’s DOJ has further inflated the parameters for FBI intelligence gathering. Drawing on the FBI’s continued reliance on its own radicalization report, the bureau under Obama has increased emphasis on surveillance and “sting” operations in Muslim communities. The Senate confirmation earlier this week of Obama’s choice of FBI Director James Comey promises more of the same. Obama’s DOJ attributes a disproportionate, stereotyping sense of dangerousness to Muslim defendants, regularly subjecting them to prolonged solitary confinement and sensory deprivation pre-trial, to special prisons like the Communication Management Units in Terre Haute and Marion and to a disproportionate housing in the nation’s federal Supermax units. The combined “War on Terror”/War on Drugs continues to send more and more people into federal prisons, disproportionately people of color, with more and more torturous conditions; while national attention has focused on the California hunger strike and the inhumane conditions there, more than 12,000 people are held in solitary confinement in federal prisons alone.

Please support our journalism. Get a digital subscription for just $9.50!

Obama has carved out his executive power against new horizons, entrenching the legal phenomenon from which racial stigma is borne. His Department of Homeland Security has deported record numbers of individuals—409,849 people in 2012 alone, with a projected 2 million total by 2014—and detains a record-breaking 400,000 immigrants annually in an archipelago of 250 jails and detention centers nationwide. Secure Communities forces local police to collaborate in enforcing federal immigration law, all but inviting police officers to intensify racial profiling. Equally breathtaking, just last week, the Obama administration again claimed for itself in federal court the right to have targeted and killed three (Muslim) American citizens, without any judicial oversight or even jurisdiction. The message sent to immigrants, to Muslims, to people of color: you are all suspects, and there is no place you should feel safe.

Obama’s seduction of the American public lies in his ability to sound the notes of racial justice and the quest for equality at key moments, while at the same time asserting unprecedented executive and federal power and giving the nod to those like Ray Kelly who actively support a differential justice system for people of color. Ray Kelly says he’s “flattered.” We should not be so easily charmed.

  • Share
  • Decrease text size Increase text size

Before commenting, please read our Community Guidelines.