Nation Conversations: Jane McAlevey on Why Unions Are Not the Problem

Nation Conversations: Jane McAlevey on Why Unions Are Not the Problem

Nation Conversations: Jane McAlevey on Why Unions Are Not the Problem

Instead of giving in to the conservative campaign to demonize organized labor, progressives should push to secure higher benefits for all workers.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Instead of giving in to the conservative campaign to demonize organized labor, progressives should push to secure higher benefits for all workers.

This week, thousands of public employees, students and their allies flooded Wisconsin’s streets to protest Governor Scott Walker’s plan to take away workers’ right to collective bargaining. This very public display of workers’ power is a much-needed reinvigoration of a beleaguered labor movement, and as Jane McAlevey outlines in her article in this week’s issue of The Nation, could be the first step toward rebuilding an ethical American economy.

In states where unions are more difficult to form, quality of life drops across the board as it becomes more difficult for all workers to negotiate the terms of their employment. That’s why it’s so disheartening, McAlevey says in this interview with executive editor Betsy Reed, that many Americans have bought into the stereotypes peddled by the likes of Wisconsin’s Walker that union workers are “lazy” and “overpaid” drains on our economy.

As a union organizer in Nevada, McAlevey experienced this assault on workers firsthand. To counter the right’s well-funded attack, McAlevey and her colleagues chose to take a stand for the gains union workers had made over a half-century of hard negotiations. Instead of pushing the benefits of government workers down to the level of the private sector, McAlevey argued that we should instead fight to bring the benefits of all workers up to the same high level of protection and quality of life. What can workers across the country learn from McAlevey’s successes?

—Kevin Gosztola

Image courtesy of OPEIU

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x