Why Congress Needs to Vote on My Bipartisan War Powers Resolution
America cannot afford another endless war in the Middle East.
Americans do not want a war with Iran. The threat of a nuclear-armed Iran is real, but dragging the United States into another conflict in the Middle East is not the solution.
President Trump’s military strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities this week put Americans, our troops, and embassies at risk. And this is only the beginning. If Trump continues down this path, the financial and human toll will rise sharply—especially if Iran follows through on its warnings that it will retaliate against US forces stationed in the region.
Congress needs to vote immediately on my bipartisan War Powers Resolution with Representative Thomas Massie to ensure that President Trump does not unilaterally escalate military action without congressional approval. Article I of the Constitution gives Congress—not the president—the sole power to declare war. It is structured as a privileged resolution, meaning it will receive a vote. Every member of Congress will have to decide whether they stand for diplomacy and the Constitution, or for endless war and executive overreach.
We have used this authority to rein in US militarism before. When I came to Congress, I worked with Senator Bernie Sanders to introduce the first War Powers Resolution in US history to pass both chambers. It aimed to end unauthorized US support for the Saudi-led war in Yemen, which had senselessly taken hundreds of thousands of innocent Yemeni lives. The resolution succeeded. It passed Congress with bipartisan support. And President Trump, faced with congressional opposition, slashed US support for the Saudi war machine, ultimately leading to their exit from the brutal conflict.
Situations such as this are exactly why our Constitution prohibits presidents from launching attacks without congressional authorization. The framers understood that once a war begins, public and political pressures often force escalation. We have proved that Congress can reassert its constitutional role—and we can do it again. But we have to act fast.
For Americans exhausted by decades of war, this week’s events feel like a bad dream. After months of direct diplomacy between the United States and Iran, President Trump’s emissaries were preparing for another round of nuclear negotiations.
The prospects were real: A deal to constrain Iran’s nuclear program was achievable. A diplomatic deal to avert war and bring benefits to both Americans and the Iranian people was in sight.
What made this more stunning is that just weeks earlier, Trump had reportedly told Netanyahu not to launch a strike that could undermine diplomacy. Yet, following the Israeli operation, Trump reversed course—praising the attacks, leveraging them to threaten Iran, and abandoning his focus on being an elite diplomatic dealmaker.
Entrenching the US in another Middle East war is exactly what Trump had promised American voters he wouldn’t do. He campaigned against regime change wars, which he has now signaled he would support. He pledged to bring our troops home, to put “America First,” and to reduce our military footprint in the Middle East. Americans expected a focus on ending waste and lowering prices, but a conflict with Iran would explode our deficits. Ten percent of our $36 trillion national debt is from the Iraq War. Many Americans took Trump at his word. But even his own supporters are now speaking out against the strikes and further escalation with Iran.
A majority of Americans want Trump to pursue peace and diplomacy over another costly war. A new Economist/YouGov survey shows that just 16 percent of Americans support joining Israel’s conflict with Iran and a majority support US negotiations with Iran over its nuclear program. Among Trump’s own 2024 voters, most oppose US military intervention in the conflict.
And we know that diplomacy is effective. President Obama’s JCPOA limited enrichment to 3.67 percent and only in Natanz. Since Trump ripped up the agreement, there has been 60 percent enrichment in Fordo and high levels of enrichment scattered across Iran. Even if Trump’s strikes caused a temporary disruption, it would not eliminate Iran’s capacity. In reality, Iran could simply rebuild—this time with no international inspectors.
It’s not too late for Trump to reverse course and get back to the negotiating table to stop Iran from having a nuclear bomb. But if he insists on continuing down the path of war and regime change, our War Powers Resolution will ensure that the American people will know which representatives stood for peace and who voted to prolong America’s disastrous experiment with endless war that has created a generation of hate.
We cannot let the Beltway push us into another costly and disastrous conflict against the will of the American people. We need to urgently pass our bipartisan War Powers Resolution and mobilize the millions of Americans on both the left and the right who want de-escalation and a path of tough diplomacy and peace.
Support independent journalism that does not fall in line
Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets.
Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.
As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war.
In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth.
The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more.
But this journalism is possible only with your support.
This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?
More from The Nation
What to Expect From a Mammoth Disruption of Global Oil and Gas Supplies What to Expect From a Mammoth Disruption of Global Oil and Gas Supplies
And why was the Trump team so unprepared for shock waves?
The Man Who Would Be the Face of the Anti-Trump West The Man Who Would Be the Face of the Anti-Trump West
Mark Carney has put himself forward as one of the sharpest Western critics of Trump’s neo-imperial order. What’s less clear is what he’s offering in its stead.
The “Rules-Based Order” Is Gone. Let’s Not Bring It Back. The “Rules-Based Order” Is Gone. Let’s Not Bring It Back.
Trump has destroyed a global system that mostly benefited the rich and powerful. We need to create something completely different in its wake.
The Far-Right 32-Year-Old Trying to Conquer Paris The Far-Right 32-Year-Old Trying to Conquer Paris
Sarah Knafo is young, media-savvy, and surging in the race to become the next mayor of the French capital.
The Global Politics of Kwame Nkrumah The Global Politics of Kwame Nkrumah
Through Nkrumah’s story, Howard French charts the history of African decolonization and the American civil rights movement.
