Politics / July 31, 2026

Trump’s Caribbean Killing Spree Is a Feckless, Criminal Failure

Blowing up innocent fishermen hasn’t curbed the drug trade.

Jeet Heer
Donald Trump boards Air Force One on July 27, 2026.

Donald Trump boards Air Force One on July 27, 2026.

(Andrew Harnik / Getty Images)

On January 19, Carlos Mero, the captain of an Ecuadoran fishing boat named La Fiorella, called his wife on an emergency line and expressed his alarm at seeing “American aircraft, two drones, and a blue patrol ship” nearby. Mero was right to be worried. Starting in the fall of 2025, the Trump administration, on the pretense of waging a war on drugs, had ramped up a military campaign to bomb supposed drug-running boats in the Caribbean and Pacific—often in concert with regional allies such as Ecuadoran President Daniel Noboa. Mero was baffled as to why his boat was seemingly under the gunsight of the US military, since La Fiorella had been inspected and cleared by a local coast guard.

As Drop Site News reported, witnesses saw La Fiorella explode the next day. Its eight crew members, including Mero, all disappeared. There is still no confirmation that the boat was targeted by the US military, but the facts of the case are in keeping with the more than 60 boats in the Caribbean that have been bombed, which have left at least 221 dead (a number that does include probable but unverified kills such as La Fiorella).

Other examples of US-sponsored extrajudicial killing were recently highlighted in a report by Human Rights Watch. According to the organization, the report documents

serious human rights violations in a rural community on the Colombia-Ecuador border, as well as attacks on and the disappearance of fishermen at sea near the Galápagos Islands. Each incident either clearly implicates the US-Ecuador security partnership or surfaces questions about responsibility. Ecuadorian forces tortured and arbitrarily detained four farm workers, and later burned and struck a dairy farm, during what the United States called a “partnered operation.” And drones of unknown origin attacked two fishing vessels, injuring several crew members. A third vessel remains missing.

Donald Trump is inordinately proud of his intensification of the war on drugs, which he’s touted as a great success. In a Truth Social post in April, Trump claimed, “98.2% of Drugs coming into the U.S. by Ocean or Sea have STOPPED!” Quoting Trump’s words, The Washington Post reports, “Trump has said at least 15 times, including as recently as last month, that the strikes have reduced maritime drug trafficking into the country by 97 or 98 percent.”

Any sentient creature will be skeptical of Trump’s claim since he has a long history of outrageous and completely divorced from reality lying. But it’s worth noting that even if Trump’s claims were true, they would not in fact justify the US killing spree. Smuggling drugs is a crime, not an act of war that merits summary execution. As I’ve noted before, Trump’s policy is a war crime, full stop.

But as it turns out, these war crimes are as ineffectual as they are vile. On Monday, the Post reported:

The Trump administration’s deadly military strikes on alleged drug trafficking boats have not reduced the amount of cocaine entering the United States, but they’re prompting criminal organizations to develop new strategies and tactics and undermining traditional investigative methods, according to a previously unreported assessment by the Drug Enforcement Administration, a closed-door congressional briefing and interviews with current and former U.S. and foreign officials.

In a recent assessment reviewed by The Washington Post, DEA analysts found the strikes had failed to affect the supply or price of cocaine in the United States and had led traffickers to diversify beyond go-fast boats and to avoid international waters, opting instead for larger boats and hemming close to coastlines, where U.S. forces are less likely to open fire. In a closed-door briefing last month, Pentagon officials told lawmakers the strikes in international waters off South and Central America had not reduced its purity.

This was an entirely predictable fiasco. The War on Drugs has been a bipartisan effort dating back to the Nixon administration. The simplest way to document its failure is to note that during this period, the price of drugs that are regarded as most dangerous has continued a long-term decline. In 2012, the price of cocaine was 80 percent less than in 1982. According to the Post, “Based on pricing, there might, in fact, now be more cocaine circulating in the United States. In Florida, cocaine is selling for $13,000 to $15,000 per kilogram, a senior DEA official said, a drop of roughly 50 percent over the last five years.”

The War on Drugs might in fact be the only effective anti-inflation policy the United States has ever developed. While nearly everything else, ranging from food to housing to transportation, gets more costly, it has never been cheaper to get high as a kite. This is true no matter how many innocent fishermen the United States military drops bombs on or how many Central and South American governments get trained in the dark art of torture. The drug issue is driven by supply more than demand. As long as people in the United States have an inordinate interest in drugs, drugs will be extremely profitable, which means that smugglers will find ever-more-ingenious ways to get their goods to the market.

Trump’s escalation of the War on Drugs is vile, but it reflects a deeper failure in the US political system. Trump isn’t the only one who has failed to learn that the War on Drugs is lost. On this issue, at least, he is merely building on a long and discredited tradition.

Become a Sustaining Donor This September

Between the reemergence of right-wing red-baiting and Donald Trump’s use of the chilling National Security Presidential Memorandum–7 to criminalize left political organizing, we’re seeing McCarthyism reborn before our eyes.

This assault on democracy cannot be ignored or wished away. Resisting it requires bravery in the face of threats and repression, a steadfast commitment to the truth, and the unwavering belief that we can—and will—overcome this darkness.

We must have an independent media that sets the record straight, unearths corruption and abuses of power, and advances a politics of justice and dignity for all if we’re to win this fight.

That’s why I’m writing to you today. This September, The Nation needs to add 100 monthly donors to sustain our progressive journalism. Your contribution makes the next investigative report, the next truth-speaking column, and the next pathbreaking essay all possible. 

I hope you’ll support our work with a recurring donation today. If you donate $10 or more a month, we’ll send you a brand new “Hands Off the Free Press!” sticker to recognise your commitment to our cause. Please, donate today. 

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Jeet Heer

Jeet Heer is a national affairs correspondent for The Nation and host of the weekly Nation podcast, The Time of Monsters. He also pens the monthly column “Morbid Symptoms.” The author of In Love with Art: Francoise Mouly’s Adventures in Comics with Art Spiegelman (2013) and Sweet Lechery: Reviews, Essays and Profiles (2014), Heer has written for numerous publications, including The New Yorker, The Paris Review, Virginia Quarterly Review, The American Prospect, The GuardianThe New Republic, and The Boston Globe.

More from The Nation

Lindsay Clancy looks on as jurors (out of frame) enter the courtroom during Clancy's murder trial at the Plymouth County Superior Court in Plymouth, Massachusetts, on September 4, 2026.

MAGA Is Exploiting the Lindsay Clancy Case to Try to End Voting for Women MAGA Is Exploiting the Lindsay Clancy Case to Try to End Voting for Women

As Trump subverts elections, his most ardent fans want to overturn the 19th Amendment.

Jeet Heer

Artificial Intelligence: Who Is Giving Birth to the Future?

Artificial Intelligence: Who Is Giving Birth to the Future? Artificial Intelligence: Who Is Giving Birth to the Future?

What are the dangers of surrendering too much of our humanity to technology?

OppArt / Andrea Arroyo

The US Had a Choice After 9/11. It Chose Wrong.

The US Had a Choice After 9/11. It Chose Wrong. The US Had a Choice After 9/11. It Chose Wrong.

In this week’s Elie v. U.S., our justice correspondent reflects on September 11. Plus: the stupidity of the "Trump Dividend" and the threat of AI.

Elie Mystal

Read Bernie’s Bill Here

Read Bernie’s Bill Here Read Bernie’s Bill Here

The AI backlash hits critical mass.

Steve Brodner

Trump Wants Voters to Pretend He’s on the Ballot

Trump Wants Voters to Pretend He’s on the Ballot Trump Wants Voters to Pretend He’s on the Ballot

But Republican midterm candidates are hoping everyone forgets he exists.

Chris Lehmann

Remembrance: 25 Years Since the September 11 Attacks

Remembrance: 25 Years Since the September 11 Attacks Remembrance: 25 Years Since the September 11 Attacks

On September 11, 2001, coordinated terrorist attacks carried out by the extremist group al-Qaeda killed 2,977 people and injured more than 6,000 others in the United States.

OppArt / Andrea Arroyo