Make No Mistake, This Is Trump’s Worst Move Yet
He fired qualified military leaders and hired lesser men who are loyal to him. If you’re wondering where all of this is going: Prepare for autocracy.
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Charles Brown Jr. listens to US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth answer reporters’ questions on February 5, 2025, in Arlington, Virginia.
(Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images)
In his last term, Donald Trump elevated a military leader with a macho, borderline-sadistic nickname: He made four-star Marine Gen. Jim “Mad Dog” Mattis his defense secretary. But Mattis, who was supremely qualified for the job, hated the nickname, and ultimately hated working with the lawbreaking Trump, and resigned.
Now Trump has chosen retired Air Force Lt. Gen. Dan “Razin’” Caine to head the joint chiefs of staff. “Razin’” Caine’s only qualification is that he is white. Also, he has embraced his nickname.
According to the Associated Press, he was “most recently the associate director for military affairs at the CIA.” Though since then he’s worked for crypto-affiliated hedge funds, which Trump adores. The AP continues: “[Caine] has not had key assignments identified in law as prerequisites for the job, including serving as either the vice chairman, a combatant commander or a service chief.” Put another way, Caine is way underqualified.
Perfect!
The Friday night massacre of top military leaders, including the second Black man (after Colin Powell) to run the Joint Chiefs, four-star Air Force fighter pilot Gen. Charles Q. Brown, and the first female Navy Secretary, Lisa Franchetti, after already firing Coast Guard Chief Linda Fagan, is said to be wrenching out “DEI.” In reality, it is wrenching out hard-won competence.
The sex-abusing drunkard who took over defense had written and spoken about his disdain for Brown earlier: “First of all, you gotta fire, you know, you gotta fire the chairman of Joint Chiefs,” he said in a podcast last year. In one of his books, he asked whether Brown got the job because he was Black.
“Was it because of his skin color? Or his skill? We’ll never know, but always doubt—which on its face seems unfair to CQ. But since he has made the race card one of his biggest calling cards, it doesn’t really much matter,” Hegseth wrote.
Joint Chief chairs normally remain in place as administrations change. Not this administration.
I’m not a fangirl of the military. I don’t look to them as our guarantor of freedom. I am a left-wing journalist, after all. But let’s accept: These are some of the best. And Trump will replace them with some of the worst. Just like he chose Hegseth.
Hegseth also fired the chief judges (JAGs) adjudicating misconduct in the Navy, Army, and Air Force. That’s never been done before, either. Lest that seem like a minor bureaucratic move, they’re the ones who weigh in when military officers or personnel break US laws or rules of engagement. As Senator Jack Reed said, “firing the military’s most senior legal advisers is an unprecedented and explicit move to install officers who will yield to the president’s interpretation of the law, with the expectation they will be little more than yes men on the most consequential questions of military law.”
But Hegseth answered, “Ultimately, we want lawyers who give sound constitutional advice and don’t exist to attempt to be roadblocks to anything that happens.”
Of course, Hegseth isn’t noting (nor is Trump) that Trump nominated Brown to be the Air Force’s chief of staff. He hailed his own decision to appoint the “first-ever African American military service chief,” and called the general “a Patriot and Great Leader.”
That was then.
If you’re wondering where we’re going, obviously all the layoffs in all the agencies are bad. And all the pushback is wonderful.
But these firings are the actual worst. If you had doubts that the Trump team is preparing for autocracy, please don’t anymore. Please prepare accordingly. This is very scary.
Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign
With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.
As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.
The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.
We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.
It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.
Onward,
Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation
