Joe Manchin Is Tired of Your Tiresome Questions

Joe Manchin Is Tired of Your Tiresome Questions

Joe Manchin Is Tired of Your Tiresome Questions

But he’ll keep talking anyway because he loves the sound of his own voice. Happy Senate New Year!

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

The US Senate returned to work Tuesday, commencing a bright new year in which all things seemed possible. It’s the first year since 2016 in which Donald Trump will not be president even for one day. As if to remind us of our clean political slate, Washington was blanketed in clean white snow. And yet some things don’t change: Joe Manchin spent the day talking about Joe Manchin.

My friend Charlie Pierce calls Manchin “the Prime Minister of America.” I wish I’d thought of that. As the Senate renewed its increasingly urgent business, Manchin wasted no time before reminding us that he’s the roadblock to the Democrats’ entire agenda–-and he’s loving every minute of it.

Punchbowl’s Jake Sherman “scooped” us all by transcribing something Manchin told a gaggle of reporters yesterday. It’s incoherent, but you get his drift.

The quote goes: “I’m really not going to talk about Build Back Better anymore because I think I‘ve been clear about all of that. There [are] no negotiations going on at this time. OK? There’s an awful lot of things that were very, I think, well intended. And there was a lot of things that was pretty far reach on some things. And in the most delicate times that we have right now. And our country is divided. And I don’t intend to do anything that divides our country anymore. So whatever I can do, to unite and bring people together. And that means you have to work harder as you work across the aisle to bring people together.”

I cannot find audio or video of what Sherman transcribed, so I have to leave it at that. “Delicate times?” Lots of partial sentences? Manchin might have been returning from his final New Year’s Eve party when he said that. I don’t know. Some things he said are transparently not true. There are definitely negotiations going on. Lots of Democrats in Congress are trying to figure out what might get Manchin’s vote—and what would also keep progressives on board. (Remember: We also have some votes.) It’s ridiculous arrogance to say “no negotiations” are going on “at this time.” But that’s our Joe.

Then he went around and talked about Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer’s plan to bring up Manchin’s own voting rights legislation. That’s right: Manchin didn’t like the two bills Democrats passed out of the House, so he cobbled together a compromise (with other Democrats, to be fair). He acted like his compromise could get 10 GOP votes; it got one, Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski’s. So, to make it law, Democrats will have to do something to get around the filibuster that requires it to get 60 votes. It’s worth noting that we never say “do away with the filibuster” anymore. We just talk about various carve-outs for various issues—in this case, voting rights. We progressives are pragmatic and desperate people.

Manchin is neither pragmatic nor progressive nor desperate. Schumer is trying to figure out a way to pass Manchin’s own bill, but Manchin doesn’t seem to care. He talked himself blue in the face about the trouble with carve-outs; this was his best line: “Anytime there’s a carve-out, you eat the whole turkey.” Still, he left a few doors open for a filibuster compromise. Stay tuned.

And that’s what he wants us to do: Stay tuned to The Joe Manchin Show.

The truth is, we have no choice right now. He, and/or Arizona’s Kyrsten Sinema, can pass or block the Democrats’ agenda in the Senate. That’s why reporters trail him everywhere, even as he insists he won’t talk about the thing he will immediately talk about.

New year, same problem. It already feels like Groundhog Day.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x