Letters From the September 19/26, 2022, Issue

Letters From the September 19/26, 2022, Issue

Letters From the September 19/26, 2022, Issue

Studying ecology… Pipelines to plowshares… Graphic depictions…

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Studying Ecology

Re “The Tick Apocalypse,” by Jimmy Tobias [Aug. 8/15]: Among recent advances in our understanding of Lyme disease, a 2021 work by Howard S. Ginsberg et al. in PLOS Biology established why the disease is so rare in the southern US, despite the occurrence of the appropriate tick vectors. In brief, these ticks show a strong preference for reptiles rather than mammals, and these reptiles are poor hosts for the Lyme bacterium. Indeed, the research points to the importance of studying animal ecology and supporting land use and management plans that promote reptile populations. As winter temperatures continue to rise with climate change, their numbers may grow in higher latitudes and lower the incidence of the disease.
Manuel Lerdau
Departments of Environmental Sciences and of Biology
University of Virginia

charlottesville, va.

Pipelines to Plowshares

Two powerful streams of thought that challenge the necessity for violence in the struggle against climate change deserved more consideration in Thea Riofrancos’s otherwise helpful review of Andreas Malm’s book How to Blow Up a Pipeline [“A Burning Planet,” Aug. 8/15]. One is the moral case for the pacifism that Malm apparently dismisses, whose roots can include the Gospel, social justice, and the spiritual imagination. A direct challenge to Malm’s argument can be found in the creative (yet destructive of property) civil disobedience of Daniel and Philip Berrigan and their anti-war Plowshares movement allies.

The other case is the pragmatic one. In their study of campaigns for social change between 1900 and 2016, Erica Chenoweth and Maria Stephan found that a commitment to nonviolence received higher levels of citizen support, generated opportunities for creative tactical shifts, and evoked less defensive responses from the ruling powers than their violent counterparts. The evidence of the strengths and successes of nonviolence refutes Malm’s too easy and, in my opinion, dangerous recommendation of violence as the method for combating climate change.

Walter (Jerry) Kendall
Professor Emeritus
University of Illinois Chicago School of Law

chicago

Graphic Depictions

The illustration by Lily Qian for the review of Vladimir Soro­kin’s novel Their Four Hearts is magnificent [“Pure Negation,” Aug. 8/15]. Gorgeous and mysteriously compelling at first, it merits reexamination after reading Gregory Afinogenov’s informative article, at which point you realize that it simultaneously conveys the ideas and the emotive punch of Sorokin’s writings. Bravo, and more illustrations from this artist please.
Sean Brady

Corrections

In the Aug. 8/15 issue: “The Tick Apocalypse” incorrectly referred to ticks as insects. In “A Burning Planet,” the name of the Lummi Nation was misspelled. “Selective Empathy,” by Viet Thanh Nguyen, stated that Lt. William Calley was pardoned by Richard Nixon. Calley was not pardoned; after Nixon’s intervention on his behalf, he was paroled and spent much of the sentence under house arrest.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x