Zardari Out? And Massacre in Afghanistan

Zardari Out? And Massacre in Afghanistan

Zardari Out? And Massacre in Afghanistan

 Could a new civil war be brewing in Afghanistan, fueled by Pakistan’s secret service?

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Veils continue to drop in Pakistan. Just weeks after Admiral Mike Mullen, the outgoing chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, called the Haqqani group a “veritable arm” of the Pakistan intelligence service, and in the midst of an ongoing political crisis in Pakistan over the so-called Memogate scandal, it appears that President Asif Ali Zardari is on the skids. If so, it means that the Pakistan military is moving once again to take the reins of power in its hands.

Among other things, that bodes ill for America’s war in Afghanistan, since it means that Pakistan may also be planning a major escalation of its insurgency there. Just yesterday, a terrorist group, Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, carried out a horrific massacre of Shiite worshippers in simultaneous bomb attacks in Kabul and two cities, killing scores of people. Prresident Karzai of Afghanistan said that he intends to confront the government of Pakistan about the massacre. "We are investigating this issue and we are going to talk to the Pakistani government about it," he said.

Zardari, meanwhile, reportedly suffered a mild heart attack and left the country for the United Arab Emirates. It isn’t clear yet if Zardari is quietly leaving power, but the UAE has always been a refuge for ousted Pakistani politicians-in-exile.

Over the last several weeks, Zardari has been caught up in a massive scandal called Memogate. According to the story, which has roiled politics in Pakistan, Zardari and Husain Haqqani, the former Pakistan ambassador to the United States—and no relation to the Haqqani group allied to Al Qaeda and the Taliban—sought US help in stopping a coup d’état by the Pakistan army in the wake of the May 1 killing of Osama bin Laden by US Special Forces. Zardari and Haqqani told Mike Mullen, through former Obama administration national security adviser Jim Jones, that they were prepared to launch a countercoup of their own, ousting the Pakistan chief of staff and the head of the ISI and reorienting Pakistan foreign policy away from support for terrorism. It was an unlikely plot, at best, but in case it may have sealed Zardari’s doom.

On Monday, at a forum that I attended at the Brookings Institution, Bruce Riedel—who was the architect in 2009 of President Obama’s Afghanistan policy—predicted that a slow-motion coup might likely bring Pakistan’s military into power once again.

If that’s what’s happening, then most worrying about the Shiite massacre in Afghanistan is that it could be a sign that elements in Pakistan are prepared to unleash unbridled violence, and risk and all-out ethnic and sectarian civil war, if they don’t get their way in Afghanistan. Pakistan is already taking steps against the United States, order the closure of the supply lines to the Afghan war and ousting US drones from a secret base in Baluchistan. And Pakistan boycotted a crucial international summit on Afghanistan on Monday, dealing a severe blow to US hopes that some sort of political accord might emerge to end the fighting in Afghanistan. Lots of observers are already predicting that a bloody civil war, like the one that preceded Taliban rule in the early 1990s, might erupt in Afghanistan as NATO forces leave. Maybe it’s already starting.

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x