Why Tax When You Can Freeze?

Why Tax When You Can Freeze?

"The hard truth" is that controlling the deficit’s going to "require some broad sacrifice" that public workers are going to have to share in, said the Pres.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Corporate profits are up, especially in finance, and yet hiring and wages aren’t. No matter how much productivity spikes, wages stay stagnant. They haven’t budged. That means workers doing more work for less pay. So what’s a Democratic administration to do?

Freeze federal workers’ wages! That’s what. President Obama on Monday announced a two year pay freeze for civilian federal workers. "The hard truth" is that controlling the deficit’s going to "require some broad sacrifice" that public workers are going to have to share in, said the Pres.

A brave move to take on those overpriced slackers on the federal dime. . . Right?

Not quite. Federal workers are an easy target because it’s been drilled into us that public workers are soaking up taxpayer largesse. But it’s not true. As Lawrence Mishel at the Economic Policy Institute notes, federal workers’ pay actually lags behind the private sector about 22 percent—according to the government’s own figures.

And although that $2 billion Obama estimates he’ll save in cost-of-living increases for federal employees sounds like a lot of money, it isn’t. I mean, compare it to the $700 billion that we handed over to Wall Street, or the $700 billion we pour into the war budget…

But where else is the government going to get $2 billion? Well, journalist and Das Krapital blogger Moe Tkacik points out that if we wanted to raise taxes on the wealthiest one percent instead, we’d have to raise them a whole lot! Like, 0.072 percentage points! (“Tax only billionaires and centimillionaires, and you could do it with an extra 0.275 percent in taxes at most," she notes.)

But why tax bailed-out billionaires when there are struggling federal workers you can squeeze?

And a public employees union you can stick it to?

I mean, who ELSE are they going to vote for?

The F Word is a regular commentary by Laura Flanders, the host of GRITtv and editor of At The Tea Party, out now from OR Books. GRITtv broadcasts weekdays on DISH Network and DIRECTv, on cable, and online at GRITtv.org and TheNation.com. Follow GRITtv or GRITlaura on Twitter and be our friend on

 
Like this blog post? Read all Nation blogs on the Nation’s free iPhone App, NationNow.
NationNow iPhone App
 

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x