Why Romney Bashes Obama’s Harvard Education

Why Romney Bashes Obama’s Harvard Education

Why Romney Bashes Obama’s Harvard Education

 Romney has deeper ties to Harvard than Obama. But since when did shameless pandering have to make sense? 

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Mitt Romney is the archetypal Harvard alum. He went there for law school and business school. After graduating he joined the Boston Consulting Group, which heavily recruits Harvard MBAs. He went on to amass a fortune through consulting and private equity work in the Boston area.

As Benjy Sarlin notes in TPM, “Three of his sons attended Harvard and he has donated over $50,000 to the university. His campaign lists over a dozen advisers with Harvard ties.” Romney has also publicly sung Harvard’s praises. With his stiffly coiffed hair and habit of using awkward jargon, Romney is the epitome of America’s academically credentialed business elite.

And that’s the problem. Romey is an uncomfortable fit for a political party deeply suspicious of intellectualism and cosmopolitanism. So he has made bashing President Obama’s ties to Harvard–Obama also attended Harvard Law School–a feature of his stump speeches. He regularly tosses out the meaningless complaint that Obama takes “advice from the Harvard faculty lounge.” Sometimes he even does so the day before bragging that a Harvard professor supports one of his own plans. The slur is fundamentally silly, and all the more so coming from Romney.

On Thursday, as Sarlin reports, he went after Obama for having maybe spent “too much time at Harvard.” Romney, of course, spent even more time there than did Obama. (Romney’s combined degree program was four years, Obama spent three years in law school.)

But if you think spouting such laughably hypocritical nonsense is bad for Romney, think again. Following the mantra, often attributed to Karl Rove, that a politician must attack his opponent’s strength, Romney is trying to neutralize Obama’s biographical advantages.

Obama’s Harvard pedigree, of course, plays differently than Romey’s. Romney is the son of an auto executive, George Romney, who became governor of Michigan. Going to an expensive graduate school comes across as merely fulfilling his life’s destiny. That is all the more true because Romney only used his degrees to make piles of money. Obama, the bi-racial son of a single mother, went to Harvard after working as a community organizer on the South Side of Chicago. He wrote movingly about those experiences in his lovely memoir, Dreams from My Father.

Someone with a sense of shame would, in Romney’s shoes, avoid calling Obama an elitist. But Romney is utterly shameless in his pandering. And, as I’ve written, that is his greatest asset. Romney will say absolutely anything if it is the right thing to say politically.

Biographical jiu-jitsu as ridiculous as Romney’s has worked before. Consider George W. Bush. The son of a president and grandson of a senator, he ran portrayed himself as a Washington outsider and his opponent, Al Gore, as an alien creature of the Beltway. In 2004 Bush, a draft-dodger, attacked decorated Vietnam veteran John Kerry as anti-military elitist. And it worked. So laugh at Romney’s silliness if you want to, but the last laugh may be his.

 

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x