Why Republican Oligarchs May Not Choose to Defend Mitt Romney

Why Republican Oligarchs May Not Choose to Defend Mitt Romney

Why Republican Oligarchs May Not Choose to Defend Mitt Romney

If Romney’s candidacy opens up a national dialogue about tax fairness, that’s a problem for himand for the funders of Republican campaigns.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

It is fair to say that few candidates in modern history have done themselves more damage than did Mitt Romney’s “crack” campaign team when it decided to release the candidate’s tax returns on the day that President Obama was delivering a State of the Union address about tax fairness.

If Romney has not fired the “genius” who suggested the idea of releasing the returns on SOTU day—apparently in hopes the news that Romney was only paying at a 13.9 percent rate would be overshadowed by the presidential pronouncement—he should do so.

The miscalculation on the part of Romney and his campaign was startling. Instead of avoiding the spotlight on an issue that is severely damaging to his candidacy—both as a contender for the Republican nomination and, should he survive the trial by Newt, as the party’s candidate in a fall race with Obama—he stepped right into it.

Romney’s bad timing made him Exhibit A in the national debate about why the the billionaires and millionaires pay lower tax rates than their secretaries.

Or, as the Los Angeles Times headline put it: “Romney tax returns highlight tax code’s breaks for rich.”

That’s bad for Romney.

But he is not the only 1 Percenter who is threatened.

If America is entering a new populist moment, where the slogan “Tax the Rich” is dusted off by Democratic candidates, and perhaps even a few Republicans, the filthiest of the filthy rich might have to clean up their acts.

Or, to be more precise, they might have to pay their fair share.

If the program Obama is promoting gets traction, Romney’s tax burden would double.

And, while we are only talking degrees of guilt here, Romney actually pays more taxes than a lot of the other guys at the country club.

So this raises a question: Do the CEOs, the investment bankers and the hedge fund managers who form the real base of the Republican Party—as the funders of GOP candidates and the Super PACs that sustain them—really want to nominate a candidate whose very presence at the top of the ticket guarantees that the lifestyles of the rich and contemptuous will be a 2012 campaign issue?

Are they feeling that lucky?

If not, they’re going to be looking elsewhere, especially if William Jennings Gingrich wins next Tuesday’s Florida primary. There will not be a groundswell among the monied elites for Gingrich. He’s toxic. But the roadblock he is creating to Romney opens up the prospect that Republican powerbrokers might be able to create a new candidacy come convention time.

Gingrich’s sweep of the South Carolina primary last Saturday made Romney damaged goods.

But the tax returns fiasco has done the former front-runner’s prospects even more damage.

And as the damage was being done, there was Mitch Daniels looking all presidential for his State of the Union response.

Don’t think the people who write big checks to Republican candidates in order to avoid writing big checks to the IRS failed to notice.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read, just one of the many incisive, deeply-reported articles we publish daily. Now more than ever, we need fearless journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media.

Throughout this critical election year and a time of media austerity and renewed campus activism and rising labor organizing, independent journalism that gets to the heart of the matter is more critical than ever before. Donate right now and help us hold the powerful accountable, shine a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug, and build a more just and equitable future.

For nearly 160 years, The Nation has stood for truth, justice, and moral clarity. As a reader-supported publication, we are not beholden to the whims of advertisers or a corporate owner. But it does take financial resources to report on stories that may take weeks or months to properly investigate, thoroughly edit and fact-check articles, and get our stories into the hands of readers.

Donate today and stand with us for a better future. Thank you for being a supporter of independent journalism.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x