Why I’m Suing the New York State Democratic Party for Interfering in Its Own Primary

Why I’m Suing the New York State Democratic Party for Interfering in Its Own Primary

Why I’m Suing the New York State Democratic Party for Interfering in Its Own Primary

Under the direction of Andrew Cuomo, the party has spent a small fortune supporting my opponent’s campaign.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

I’m a Democrat, and this year I decided to run in the primary for lieutenant governor. My opponent, former Representative Kathy Hochul, is also a Democrat, but we differ on policy, particularly in areas like immigration policy, environmental protection and gun rights.

So far so good, but here’s the crazy part. The state Democratic Party that is running the primary (ostensibly to select the best candidate) is spending money—millions, by our estimates—to try to ensure that my opponent wins. Under the admitted direction of Governor Andrew Cuomo, New York’s Democratic Party has spent a small fortune supporting my opponent’s campaign, including spending on literature for voters, phonebanking, television ads and, most recently, robocalls performed by Hillary Clinton.

It is an obvious conflict of interest for the party to both run a primary and then provide aid to one side. That’s why, back in 1911, the New York legislature made it illegal for political parties to spend money to influence the outcomes of their own primaries. Yet despite the illegality and ethical question, the Democratic Party in New York State keeps at it.

My running mate Zephyr Teachout and I challenged the party’s illegal spending in court. Lawyers for Andrew Cuomo and the party have responded that their actions are protected by the First Amendment, based on a Citizens United theory. So even though the Democratic Party is running the primary, Cuomo’s lawyers maintain that the party retains a constitutional right to try to ensure that the Governor’s favorites will win it. As of this writing the case is pending—unfortunately, it will likely not get decided before the primary election.

But the party’s lawyers have overstated their case, for the First Amendment does not so clearly support such monkey business. Citizens United was about independent spending; here the relevant rule is from Buckley v. Valeo, the 1976 Supreme Court case, which ruled that coordinated expenditures have only limited First Amendment protection. In New York, the only state case to decide on the constitutionality of the rule has upheld the legislature’s long-standing ban on directed party involvement in its own primary.

Leaving the Constitution aside, it is also simply wrong for the party to both run a primary and spend money trying to make sure one side wins. Parties are free, of course, not to have a primary at all. But the very reason to have a primary is to try to make sure that the candidates really have the support of the voters. To promise the voters a democratic process, and then tilt the playing field, is ultimately a corruption of the democratic process.

Thank you for reading The Nation

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read, just one of the many incisive, deeply-reported articles we publish daily. Now more than ever, we need fearless journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media.

Throughout this critical election year and a time of media austerity and renewed campus activism and rising labor organizing, independent journalism that gets to the heart of the matter is more critical than ever before. Donate right now and help us hold the powerful accountable, shine a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug, and build a more just and equitable future.

For nearly 160 years, The Nation has stood for truth, justice, and moral clarity. As a reader-supported publication, we are not beholden to the whims of advertisers or a corporate owner. But it does take financial resources to report on stories that may take weeks or months to properly investigate, thoroughly edit and fact-check articles, and get our stories into the hands of readers.

Donate today and stand with us for a better future. Thank you for being a supporter of independent journalism.

Ad Policy
x