Whose Genocide Counts?

Whose Genocide Counts?

The House Foreign Affairs Committee bravely declares the 1915 slaughter of Armenians in Turkey genocide. Why not put the same label on themselves, for their role in the Iraq catastrophe?

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Thank God! We have been waiting almost 100 years for the House Foreign Affairs Committee to do it and at long last they did, those statesmen and stateswomen! They voted to declare the 1915 massacres of Armenians by the Turks an official genocide.

Now, don’t you feel better? Isn’t the world a better place for this courageous act on the part of our legislators? Aren’t we all freer? Stronger? Safer? More long-lived? Healthier? Richer? Wiser and better sexually adjusted?

What’s next? A resolution condemning Napoleon’s invasion of Egypt and the slaughter visited on the Egyptians at the Battle of the Pyramids? And how about a little legislative attention for the Romans killed by Hannibal at the Battle of Cannae in 216 BC. Better look into that one, too, guys.

Do you think that the House Foreign Affairs Committee might, after it has righted any number of ancient wrongs, look into what the Sam Hill is going on now? This very committee has a direct responsibility for the death of 600,000 Iraqis and the flight of some 2 million more from their homes. Does that bear a little looking into? While they are putting the genocide label on others, would the gentlemen and gentleladies of the committee consider putting some sort of label on themselves?

The horrific murders of the Armenians occurred almost a century ago. However, the murders in Iraq are going on now, fellas. Does that fact suggest that you might have more urgent business than chewing over crimes of yesteryear?

The answer is no, thanks to the Armenian lobby. Many persons of Armenian extraction live in vote-rich California, which explains why these politicians have flung themselves into the study of bygone events. Once again the pander bear stalks the land.

No countervailing Turkish lobby exists in California, but in Turkey, people are riled up over their being called names by disreputable American politicians. So we are faced with two dangers to counterbalance each other.

Danger number one is what will happen if Congress does not pass a resolution calling the events of 1915 genocide. That might result in a couple members of the California Congressional delegation losing their jobs a year from November. Danger number two is what happens if they go ahead with their genocide resolution. The Turks could kick the United States out of our Air Force Base at Insirlik, which it needs to carry on its shenanigans in Iraq. The Turks could do quite a few other things that we would not like to see them do, but better to cave in to another pressure group.

Committee chairman Tom Lantos, a Democrat from California, hit it on the head when he said, “We have to weigh the desire to express our solidarity with the Armenian people…against the risk that it could cause young men and women in the uniform of the United States armed services to pay an even heavier price.”

So Lantos and the rest voted for the resolution and for our people paying “an even heavier price.”

And those people on Capitol Hill can’t understand why their poll ratings are even lower than Bush’s.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x