Who Are You Calling Crazy?

Who Are You Calling Crazy?

Melissa Harris-Lacewell discusses Obama’s desire to keep democratic processes intact and what being “crazy” can really mean.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

type=”application/x-shockwave-flash” width=”480″ height=”390″
allowscriptaccess=”always” allowfullscreen=”true”>

Nation contributor Melissa Harris-Lacewell appears on GritTV to
answer the question: “Who are you calling crazy?” Harris-Lacewell
alludes to Jonathan Metzl’s book Protest Psychosis in which middle-class
white women had been misdiagnosed as schizophrenic for their inability
to conform into their role of domesticity. “On the one hand, there is
this idea that insanity is an individual characteristic,”
Harris-Lacewell says. “But on the other hand, insanity might be an
appropriate response to situations like oppression and inequality and a
truly crazy system in which people are simply trying to cope.”

Likewise, politics is suffering from an equal misunderstanding of
ideologies and perception today. What does matter, she argues, is
finding the truths in politics and urging others to move beyond using
lazy “crazy” insults. In regards to the recent Supreme Court rulings, Obama’s “slow progress” and the health care crisis, Harris-Lacewell finds growth in Obama’s need to abide by democratic processes. “He understands and believes that we’re not just committed to a set of democratic outcomes,” she says. “But we also have to be committed to a set of democratic processes–the belief that if we won, we have to give and allow space and voice for those who lost. And it irritates us because now that we’re finally in power as progressives, we really just want to do what we want to do.”

Clarissa León

Check out more great Nation videos on our <a
href=”http://www.youtube.com/user/videonation”>YouTube channel.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x