Who Are You Calling Crazy?

Who Are You Calling Crazy?

Melissa Harris-Lacewell discusses Obama’s desire to keep democratic processes intact and what being “crazy” can really mean.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

type=”application/x-shockwave-flash” width=”480″ height=”390″
allowscriptaccess=”always” allowfullscreen=”true”>

Nation contributor Melissa Harris-Lacewell appears on GritTV to
answer the question: “Who are you calling crazy?” Harris-Lacewell
alludes to Jonathan Metzl’s book Protest Psychosis in which middle-class
white women had been misdiagnosed as schizophrenic for their inability
to conform into their role of domesticity. “On the one hand, there is
this idea that insanity is an individual characteristic,”
Harris-Lacewell says. “But on the other hand, insanity might be an
appropriate response to situations like oppression and inequality and a
truly crazy system in which people are simply trying to cope.”

Likewise, politics is suffering from an equal misunderstanding of
ideologies and perception today. What does matter, she argues, is
finding the truths in politics and urging others to move beyond using
lazy “crazy” insults. In regards to the recent Supreme Court rulings, Obama’s “slow progress” and the health care crisis, Harris-Lacewell finds growth in Obama’s need to abide by democratic processes. “He understands and believes that we’re not just committed to a set of democratic outcomes,” she says. “But we also have to be committed to a set of democratic processes–the belief that if we won, we have to give and allow space and voice for those who lost. And it irritates us because now that we’re finally in power as progressives, we really just want to do what we want to do.”

Clarissa León

Check out more great Nation videos on our <a
href=”http://www.youtube.com/user/videonation”>YouTube channel.

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Huevel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x