What Turnout Means

What Turnout Means

Travel day for me, so light posting. (O’Hare on the day after Mother’s day is not a place you want to be)

But if you read one piece of campaign commentary today, read this fascinating piece by Josh Kalven over at the excellent Progress Illinois.

In the piece, Kalven interviews the myserious Kos diarist Poblano. Poblano has developed his own statistical model of turnout that has proven remarkably accurate in predicting the results in primary contests. In the piece, Kalven has Poblano use his model to project what kind of electoral college gains Obama would reap in the general for every 10% he increases African American turnout. The results are eye-opening:

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Travel day for me, so light posting. (O’Hare on the day after Mother’s day is not a place you want to be)

But if you read one piece of campaign commentary today, read this fascinating piece by Josh Kalven over at the excellent Progress Illinois.

In the piece, Kalven interviews the myserious Kos diarist Poblano. Poblano has developed his own statistical model of turnout that has proven remarkably accurate in predicting the results in primary contests. In the piece, Kalven has Poblano use his model to project what kind of electoral college gains Obama would reap in the general for every 10% he increases African American turnout. The results are eye-opening:

Recently, Progress Illinois and the SEIU Illinois Council (which sponsors us) asked Poblano to examine how incremental increases in turnout among certain demographic groups would affect the outcome of an Obama-McCain contest. What he found underscores the importance of voter mobilization this year. (You can find Poblano’s own analysis here.)

Take the African-American vote, for example. With each 10 percent increase in black turnout nationwide, Obama gains an average of 13 electoral votes, while his chance of winning jumps by about eight points.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x