Walmart’s Wage Increase Is Hurting Its Stock Price—and That’s OK

Walmart’s Wage Increase Is Hurting Its Stock Price—and That’s OK

Walmart’s Wage Increase Is Hurting Its Stock Price—and That’s OK

The stock market doesn’t take long-term economic growth into account very well, so why do we look to it to see if higher wages are succeeding?


Walmart has long been known for both its rock-bottom prices and its rock-bottom pay. So the company created some real waves when it announced earlier this year that it planned to raise its starting wages to $9 an hour by April and $10 an hour by February of next year.

Part of the motivation, the company said at the time, was to improve retention, which would eventually pay off in higher sales as customers get a better experience (and more goods make it to shelves). That’s what made it an investment: the company hopes to reap the benefits of a better workforce sometime in the future. “Won’t happen immediately, but it will happen,” CEO Doug McMillon told CNBC at the time. A few months later, it reported that it had already reduced turnover.

But it also just released its financial results forecasting a drop in annual profit in the near term, in part because of the higher share it’ll be spending on wages. The news sent the company’s stock into the biggest tumble in 15 years. That has led a number of commentators to desperately warn that Walmart has become a foreboding sign of the destruction to come if the minimum wage were increased from its current level of $7.25 an hour. Increase the wage, they cry, and the costs will be too high; companies will simply close up shop.

The predictions of gloom, though, miss the point.

One reason to raise the minimum wage is because wage growth has been stagnant for decades. Another way of saying that is that although corporate profits are growing at a healthy rate—thanks in part to workers’ growing productivity—companies aren’t sharing that good fortune with their employees like they used to. It used to be that more money in corporate coffers meant more investment in things like workers’ pay. Instead, today most of it goes to shareholders and investors through stock buybacks and dividends. Those payouts ate up 91 percent of their earnings between 2003 and 2012, leaving just 9 percent to be shared between workers, equipment, research, and other investments.

A higher minimum wage is one tool the government can use to push companies toward sharing more of their gains with their employees. This is not to say that an increase should bankrupt them by forcing them to fork everything over. But Walmart is a highly profitable company and can easily afford to give a little to its employees. It made $15 billion in profit last year and has made $16 billion so far this year. A $10 wage is not going to topple it.

This kind of sharing also, of course, will probably pay off for many companies, at least in the long term. While raising wages, employers can realize savings through reduced turnover, increased performance, higher prices, and greater economic demand to cover the costs. This means that economists believe that even in the low-pay, thin-margin fast-food industry, employers could absorb a $15 minimum wage without having to resort to laying people off. All in all, there is very little evidence that higher minimum wages lead to job losses.

Companies’ savings are not always immediate, however. And that’s where Walmart is really getting in trouble. The predictions of doom are not based on the company’s fundamental financials—the company will remain profitable, after all—but on a declining stock price. Yet the stock market doesn’t take the long-term into account very well. It doesn’t measure the real economy. It is not a useful barometer of whether a policy is working or not.

A useful measure of a higher minimum wage is this: Does it hurt employment? Does it increase income? Do employers see long-term benefits? And do we start seeing a greater slice of economic growth going toward the people who are helping to generate it?

What’s clear right now is that the link between a growing economy and larger paychecks has been severed. This problem stands to undermine our entire consumer economy. A higher minimum wage is one—and one relatively minor—way to start rebalancing the equation.

Thank you for reading The Nation

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read, just one of the many incisive, deeply-reported articles we publish daily. Now more than ever, we need fearless journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media.

Throughout this critical election year and a time of media austerity and renewed campus activism and rising labor organizing, independent journalism that gets to the heart of the matter is more critical than ever before. Donate right now and help us hold the powerful accountable, shine a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug, and build a more just and equitable future.

For nearly 160 years, The Nation has stood for truth, justice, and moral clarity. As a reader-supported publication, we are not beholden to the whims of advertisers or a corporate owner. But it does take financial resources to report on stories that may take weeks or months to properly investigate, thoroughly edit and fact-check articles, and get our stories into the hands of readers.

Donate today and stand with us for a better future. Thank you for being a supporter of independent journalism.

Ad Policy