The Wages of Synergy

The Wages of Synergy

Synergy—it's all well and good. But media consolidation's dark side often raises its head.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

"The synergies are under every rock we turn over," declared Michael Eisner when the Mouse Kingdom absorbed Cap Cities/ABC in 1996, the same year The Nation's National Entertainment State made its debut. Ever since, the media conglomerates have indeed been looking in every nook and cranny of their ever-expanding empires for ways to cross-promote. This fall, AOL Time Warner left no stone unturned in heralding the release of its smash hit movie Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone. By enlisting its considerable forces–AOL, its TV networks (HBO, CNN, WB and the Cartoon Network), its magazines (including Time, Entertainment Weekly and People) and its ticketing operation, Moviefone–AOL Time Warner worked marketing magic. By opening weekend, surveys showed an incredible 100 percent awareness among moviegoers that Harry Potter was coming to a cineplex near them. You had to be under a rock to miss this one.

But when it comes to conjuring corporate synergies, not even Harry Potter's wand is as potent as the network news. Soon after the Disney merger, Good Morning America was broadcasting live from Disneyworld to mark the theme park's twenty-fifth anniversary. Even then, as the era of megamergers was just beginning, it was clear that there was, as New Yorker media critic Ken Auletta put it, "scant evidence that synergy is journalism's friend." As time passed, evidence to the contrary began to pile up: News Corporation axed the BBC from its satellite TV service in China so as not to offend the government there; CBS sat on a 60 Minutes story about Big Tobacco that might have jeopardized its upcoming merger with Westinghouse; and ABC shelved a report about pedophiles at Disney World. Less sensational instances of corporate meddling are now viewed as business as usual, with only media critics and other pointyheads bothering to protest parent-company encroachment on network news time.

Disney is hardly alone in the relentless-self-promotion department. CBS flogged Survivor with plugs on its news shows. Asked last summer on CNN's Reliable Sources about guarding the line between the news and entertainment divisions, CBS's Early Show executive producer, Steve Friedman, was unapologetic: "That line was over a long, long time ago…. Now you can lament and say it's terrible. You can say it's over, the civilization is over. You know what, to compete you've got to compete. And we are in this to win. And we will use this show to help us win."

That line does seem to belong to some distant past. A November 19 report by the Project for Excellence in Journalism found that the morning network news shows spent 33 percent of their air time selling something; on average 20 percent of the stories were for books, movies, TV shows, music or products their company produced. The study noted that the network's ownership of such products wasn't always disclosed. Friedman told the Boston Globe that while misrepresentation was wrong, complete disclosure was impractical. "We only have two hours a day. You're going to spend all your time just [disclosing] ownership."

Here's another solution: Go back to doing news.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x