Unions, MoveOn Warn Obama Not to ‘Cave’ in Secret Negotiations With House GOP

Unions, MoveOn Warn Obama Not to ‘Cave’ in Secret Negotiations With House GOP

Unions, MoveOn Warn Obama Not to ‘Cave’ in Secret Negotiations With House GOP

Obama’s deal could include deep cuts to Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security, without addressing the need for new revenues. That’s a bad deal—and progressives are speaking out against it.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

The Obama White House is reportedly in the process of negotiating a secret debt deal with House Republican leaders that could include deep cuts to Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security. The deal would not, according to media reports, significantly or immediately address the need for new revenues that can be derived from fair taxation of the wealthiest Americans.

That’s a bad deal.

Bad for American seniors and Americans who anticipate that one day they will be seniors.

Bad for the American economy.

And bad for Barack Obama politically.

So unions and progressive groups have moved to prevent any deal from moving forward.

MoveOn.org, AFL-CIO, CREDO Action, Democracy for America, PCCC, AFT, Campaign for America’s Future and Change Nation organized an Emergency Call-In Day “to demand Democrats in the House and Senate stand strong and keep their promises to reject any debt deal that slashes programs for seniors and working families while doing little or nothing to make the rich and corporations pay their share.”

Tens of thousands of call were being made Friday to Democrats in the House and Senate “demanding that they reject the terrible deal being reportedly negotiated by the White House.”

And union leaders were speaking up in blunt opposition to any compromise by the president and the Democrats on the issue of preserving Medicare.

“If press reports about a potential deal on deficit reduction turn out to be true, Medicaid will be eviscerated, access to healthcare for millions of Americans will be gutted and millions of jobs will be lost. This is morally wrong and Congress should not allow it to happen,” declared Service Employees International Union president Mary Kay Henry.

“Reported revenue measures in the deal are worse than the ‘Gang of Six’ proposal and let corporations and millionaires off the hook and avoid paying their fair share,” continued Henry, whose union has long been closely aligned with Obama. “On behalf of 2.1 million members, SEIU will not support a deal with these outcomes.”

Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders was already rallying opposition to any deal that cuts Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, saying: “The time is now for the American people to become significantly involved in that debate and not leave it to a small number of people here in Washington.”

MoveOn.org executive director Justin Ruben warned: “Any deal that slashes programs for seniors and working families while doing nothing to make the rich and corporations pay their share is a total non-starter and Democrats in Congress should rule it out immediately.”

“The Democratic base did not work night and day to elect Democrats so that they could cave to Tea Party extremists who are intent on gutting the social safety net millions of us fought to establish and protect,” explained Ruben, who notes that House minority leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate majority leader Harry Reid have worked long and hard to highlight Democratic opposition to this sort of deal. “Leaders Pelosi and Reid have been clear that a deal that includes no revenues, or that cuts Social Security and Medicare benefits, cannot get the votes of their respective caucuses. Democratic Members of Congress must keep up this strong stance. Anything less would represent a betrayal of everything Democrats stand for.”

Obama and his aides want to cut a deal.

But they cannot cut just any deal.

If the White House assaults programs such as Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security, the president will find—either quickly, via opposition from Congressional Democrats, or over time, via the collapse of energy and enthusiasm among his party’s activist base—that he is negotiating away not just his party’s legacy but perhaps the prospect of his own reelection.

Like this blog post? Read it on The Nation’s free iPhone App, NationNow.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x