Trump Is Threatening to Roll Back Normalization With Cuba—Here’s What’s at Stake

Trump Is Threatening to Roll Back Normalization With Cuba—Here’s What’s at Stake

Trump Is Threatening to Roll Back Normalization With Cuba—Here’s What’s at Stake

Obama’s Cuba policy opened a new era of peaceful coexistence. Can it survive President Trump?


“I am pleased to join in marking two years of progress since the historic decision made by the United States and Cuba to begin normalizing relations after decades of conflict and isolation,” President Obama wrote in a private letter to participants of a recent White House meeting on Cuba. The off-the-record gathering—guests included Cuban officials, prominent Cuban-American community leaders, US business representatives, US politicians, and policy advocates—was held to commemorate the second anniversary of “17-D”—the iconic date of Obama and Raúl Castro’s dramatic announcement, on December 17, 2014, that Washington and Havana would end decades of estrangement and move forward toward normal bilateral ties.

As Obama enters his final days in the White House, the break-out policy of engagement with Cuba ranks as one of his administration’s signature achievements. In just 24 months, the two nations have reopened their embassies, renewed direct commercial air travel, re-established limited trade relations, re-instituted direct mail services, and fostered a formal diplomatic framework for ongoing negotiations on issues of mutual interest as well as on issues of complex differences, such as human rights and compensation for expropriated properties. The president has used his executive authority to poke substantial holes in the long-standing economic embargo, making it possible for major US companies such as Starwood Hotels and Resorts and, most recently, Google, to do business in Havana. Last spring, Obama became the first US president in almost 90 years to travel to Cuba; there he personally advanced the hand of friendship to both the government of Raúl Castro and the Cuban people.

After more than a half-century of cold war in the Caribbean, as Obama noted in his letter, the US-Cuba détente has ended “an outdated approach” of confrontation and opened a new era of peaceful coexistence. To the great benefit of both US and Cuban citizens, Obama’s Cuba policy has transformed the closest of enemies into regional neighbors, whose common interests and significant disagreements can now be addressed through normal dialogue rather than perpetual hostility. “Through diplomacy,” Obama proudly noted in his valedictory message to the nation released this week, the United States has “opened up a new chapter with the people of Cuba.” Indeed, a key foreign-policy legacy the Obama administration leaves will be a model for the creative use of diplomatic engagement—both open and back channel—to resolve seemingly intractable and entrenched conflicts in the global arena.

That is, if it can survive Donald Trump.

* * *

Since November 8, the president-elect “has proved more than once,” as David Remnick recently observed in The New Yorker, “that it is possible to deepen global anxiety armed with nothing more than a galling level of presumption and a Twitter account.” Indeed, Trump’s unexpected election has cast a dark shadow over the future of a number of dramatic international advances—particularly the promising future of US relations with Cuba.

As a businessman, Trump favored normal economic ties with Cuba. According to news reports during the campaign, in the 1990s he secretly dispatched emissaries to scout hotel and casino opportunities in Havana; as recently as last spring, he was still making quiet inquiries.

But as a politician, Trump has catered to the hard-line, anti-normalization contingent of Cuban-American voters in Florida. During one Miami campaign rally in September, he threatened to “reverse” Obama’s policy initiatives unless Cuba “meets our demands.” Vice president–elect Mike Pence went even further: “Let me make you a promise,” he assured a crowd in Miami just before the election, “when Donald Trump is president of the United States, we will repeal Obama’s executive orders on Cuba.”

After Fidel Castro died at the age of 90 on November 25, President-elect Trump seized the opportunity to denounce the Castro regime and issue an ultimatum for concessions on social change and political liberties. “If Cuba is unwilling to make a better deal for the Cuban people, the Cuban/American people, and the US as a whole,” Trump brashly tweeted three days after Castro’s death, “I will terminate the deal.”

But Cubans, and Cuban Americans, have already approved Obama’s “deal.” Trump lost to Hillary Clinton in Miami-Dade County, which is roughly one-third Cuban-American, by some 290,000 votes; and state polls show that the majority of the Cuban-American community favor US efforts to establish better relations with Cuba. A Florida International University poll conducted in September found that 70 percent of Cuban-Americans in Miami-Dade County backed Obama’s initiative to open diplomatic relations with Cuba; and 63 percent oppose the US embargo against the island nation.

Nevertheless, Trump appears to believe he owes his electoral votes in Florida to anti-normalization hard-liners and is paying them off with political patronage.

Last month, Trump promoted Yleem Poblete, a former House Foreign Affairs Committee chief of staff under Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, to his National Security Council team. Ros-Lehtinen, the most rabid congressional opponent of Obama’s policies, once publicly called for the assassination of Fidel Castro. In the wake of Castro’s death, Poblete took to Twitter to attack Cuba: “Lost in talk of #castrodeath is #cuba regime murder of Americans, safe haven 4 terrorists & US fugitives, #Iran ties, arms to #NorthKorea,” she tweeted.

Trump has also named the leading pro-embargo lobbyist, Mauricio Claver-Carone, to the transition team at the Treasury Department where the Office of Foreign Assets Control oversees licenses and regulations for trade and travel to Cuba. Claver-Carone now has the “one job,” according to USA Today, “that’s perfectly suited for him: undoing President Obama’s normalization efforts with Cuba.”

* * *

With the future of Obama’s détente with Cuba increasingly threatened, administration officials, along with advocates and beneficiaries of normal relations, are mobilizing to defend and protect the policy. A full-court press to convince the incoming administration to stay the course on Cuba—high-profile media interviews, opinion pieces, press conferences, Congressional lobbying, reports by moderate Cuban-American leaders, letters signed by Cuban entrepreneurs, and behind-the-scenes approaches to Trump appointees—is being launched around several key arguments:

§ Engagement with Cuba is good for US business. Major airlines, cruise lines, telecom companies, hotel groups, travel agencies, Hollywood studios, multinational banks, pharmaceutical firms, and agriculture corporations, among other US enterprises, are expanding commercial ventures in Cuba. By continuing normalization of relations, Washington will generate revenues, and much-needed jobs, in key states involved in transporting and selling commercial goods to Cuba. Cuba is an emerging market—a new tourist destination, a new port for commerce, and opportunity for development—only 90 miles off our shore. If the trade embargo was fully lifted, the US International Trade Commission predicts that US exports to the island could rise from $180 million to $2.2 billion.

There is much money to be made. But, to shut the door on better relations now risks losing hundreds of millions of dollars in US sales and investment opportunities in Cuba to international and influential competitors… such as China!

§ Engagement with Cuba is good for Cuban business. Under Raúl Castro’s economic reforms, nearly one-third of the Cuban workforce has moved off the state payroll and into the growing and increasingly dynamic private sector. US engagement with Cuba supports the transformative success of the cuentapropistas—small-business entrepreneurs such as taxi drivers, mechanics, hair stylists, tour guides, artists, chefs, and thousands of apartment owners who are listing their homes on AirBnB. Obama’s opening has led to a flow of remittances from Cuban-Americans to relatives on the island, underwriting small-business development; an influx of tourists who spend money on various private sector services in Cuba; and new business relations with US companies who want to buy Cuban goods or build a presence on the island. “Our new Cuba policy is helping real people,” according to Engage Cuba, a pro-business lobby for normal relations, “from entrepreneurs starting businesses for the first time to families that are being reconnected after 55 years of estrangement.”

In December, more than a hundred of those new Cuban entrepreneurs signed a letter to Trump appealing to his business acumen. “As a successful businessman,” it read,

we’re confident that you understand the importance of economic engagement between nations. Small businesses in Cuba have the potential to be drivers of economic growth in Cuba and important partners of the US business community. Additional measures to increase travel, trade and investment, including working with the US Congress to lift the embargo, will benefit our companies, the Cuban people and US national interests. We look forward to taking advantage of any openings that your administration makes to the Cuban private sector and the Cuban economy as a whole.

At a moving press conference on Capitol Hill on December 7, four Cuban businesswomen presented the letter and issued a personal appeal to Trump not to abandon the nascent private sector they are building. “This is important for Cuba, for the Cuban entrepreneurs and for all of our families,” stated Marla Recio Carbajal, who recently started Havana Reverie, a wedding and corporate events planning agency on the island. “All of our families are dependent on this…. [we’re] growing higher salaries, growing economically, growing more independent.”

Normal relations would have a positive impact on the society at large, the four women stressed, for generations to come. “A few years ago, a new era of dreams in Cuba began,” noted Yamina Vicente, who recently created her own decorating and events-planning company called Decorazon. “I hope that my children will be able to dream too.”

§ Engagement with Cuba is good for US Interests. On December 21, Washington and Havana signed an accord on seismic data sharing to better predict earthquakes—the latest of more than a dozen new agreements in environmental, economic, educational, disaster-management, health, law-enforcement, and security spheres. Obama’s opening has accelerated cooperation in many areas of mutual interest, among them: counterterrorism, university exchanges, counter-narcotics operations, and clinical testing for a promising cancer treatment being developed in Cuban laboratories.

In communications with Trump’s transition team, Obama administration officials have also stressed the positive impact the new Cuba policy has had on the Latin America. They cite the recent peace accord ending decades of guerrilla warfare in Colombia—the Cubans hosted the negotiations between the FARC and government representatives—as well as the move away from leftist populism in the region. The rapprochement with Cuba has demonstrated Obama’s willingness to “work with everybody,” according the Ben Rhodes, the White House point man on Cuba policy, and has “transformed the nature of US engagement” with the Latin American region as a whole.

“Our new relationship with Cuba has also removed an irritant in our relationships throughout the Western Hemisphere,” Secretary of State John Kerry wrote in a 21-page memorandum summarizing foreign-policy accomplishments released today—addressed to Obama but clearly directed at the incoming Trump administration. “Going forward, if we want to deepen the connections that bind our nations and our peoples, it is critical for Congress to lift the embargo on Cuba, an outdated burden on the Cuban people that continues to impede U.S. interests.”

* * *

“Given all of this progress over the past two years, the new administration should seriously weigh the consequences of reversing the new Cuba policies,” Carlos Gutierrez, the former Cuban-American secretary of Commerce under George W. Bush, recently wrote in The Hill after he summed up these arguments. “A reversal would harm American companies. It would disconnect families, make the region less safe.” As the new Trump administration settles in, Gutierrez predicts, “they will see the economic and national security gains to be made from increased trade and engagement with Cuba, and the dangers of not engaging.”

Indeed, proponents of continuing normalization hope that Trump will keep the Cuba issue off his Twitter feed long enough for the new administration to recognize the advantages of Obama’s approach—and the disadvantages to US interests of abandoning it. “In two years, Obama’s engagement with Cuba has produced more positive results than 50 years of hostility,” points out American University professor William M. LeoGrande. “The people of Cuba support it, the people of the US support it—including most Cuban Americans—and US allies abroad support it.”

For his part, President Obama has spoken directly to Trump on the phone about Cuba, and presumably presented these arguments for sustaining a policy of civil diplomacy and engagement. In the final phase of his presidency—as well as in his soon-to-be post-presidential life—Obama has ample opportunity to publicly defend the merits of reconciliation. “By continuing to work together, we can further change an outdated approach that has failed to advance either of our interests and forge a future of greater peace and security,” he reminded the Cuban officials, Cuban-American community leaders, and advocates of normal relations who gathered at the White House to celebrate progress in US-Cuban ties last month.

“I thank all those who have played a role in normalizing relations between our two countries for their dedication,” President Obama wrote. “I encourage you to carry forward the work of strengthening our partnership in the years ahead.”

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read, just one of the many incisive, deeply reported articles we publish daily. Now more than ever, we need fearless journalism that moves the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media.

Donate right now and help us hold the powerful accountable, shine a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug, and build a more just and equitable future.

For nearly 160 years, The Nation has stood for truth, justice, and moral clarity. As a reader-supported publication, we are not beholden to the whims of advertisers or a corporate owner. But it does take financial resources to report on stories that may take weeks or months to investigate, thoroughly edit and fact-check articles, and get our stories to readers like you.

Donate today and stand with us for a better future. Thank you for being a supporter of independent journalism.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy