The Torture Legacy

The Torture Legacy

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Today at the gym I happened upon a report[PDF] from World Public Opinion about international attitudes towards human rights. (That’s DC for ya.) There’s a ton of interesting stuff in it: Palestinians are very suspicious of international bodies imposing human rights standards, the Russians are really not so sold on civil liberties (they’re split about 50/50 on whether or not the press should be able to publish “without government control”), and a somewhat shocking 28% of Americans agreed that “there are some religions that people should be allowed to practice in the US.”

But that to me was not the most disheartening result. What brought me up short was the section on torture. Interestingly the pollsters decided not to offer the issue as an either/or, but rather gave people three options. In the US, 53% of respondents said “all torture should be prohibited,” 31% think we should accept limited torture of terrorists to save innocent lives, while a nutty and sadistic 13% thinks “torture should be generally allowed.” While this still means that a slim majority of Americans reject torture (thank God), it also means that a very significant portion of the population now favors a torture regime, one that is facially a violation of Geneva, domestic law, international law, bedrock moral norms, and basic human decency.

For comparison, in Spain, Britain, France over 80% of those polled thought torture should be prohibited; in China the figure was 66%.

I can’t find previous polling from pre-9/11 of the same questioning. I suspect it doesn’t exist. But I can’t help but feel that in a very sick way, the Bush administration and the many torture apologists on the right and in he mainstream press have been quite successful in mainstreaming the unthinkable. We talk a lot about the torture legacy in terms of its affect on the American reputation abroad, the need to reform the institutions that helped carry it out (DOJ, OLC, CIA), and perhaps most importantly in terms of bringing to justice those who crafted and ordered the policy. But there’s also a tremendous amount of work to be done among the public, to shift opinion back towards the very simple principle that torture is wrong.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x