Tell the Department of Labor to Side with Retirees Over Wall Street

Tell the Department of Labor to Side with Retirees Over Wall Street

Tell the Department of Labor to Side with Retirees Over Wall Street

The Trump administration is coming after an Obama-era regulation that requires financial advisers to act in their clients’ best interests.

What’s Going On?

In February, President Trump ordered a review by the Department of Labor of an Obama-era regulation that would require retirement advisers to give their clients investment advice that’s in their best interest. The rule, called the fiduciary rule, was scheduled to go into effect this spring, but is now delayed pending a review by the DOL.

It may seem obvious that financial advisers should act in your best interest. But currently many are only required to suggest investments that are “roughly suitable” for their client—not necessarily what’s best for them. They are even able to suggest investments in products that they may have a personal stake in bolstering. Under the Obama administration, the White House Council of Economic Advisers estimated that this greedy financial practice lost Americans $17 billion a year.

Financial groups and institutions are fighting hard to make sure they can continue defrauding investors on their best interests and the Trump administration and Republican party are behind them. In January, Congressman Joe Wilson (R-SC) introduced a bill that would delay implementation of the rule for a full two years with the hopes of eventually revoking it altogether.

But the public may not let them. The DOL is accepting comments on the fiduciary rule until April 17. As of mid-March, the DOL had received over 178,000 letters in support of the rule and about 15,000 against.

What Can I Do?

Join those tens of thousands of Americans and write a letter telling the Department of Labor not to eliminate the fiduciary rule.

Read More

Back in March, Christopher D. Cook warned against giving President Trump’s labor secretary nominee, Alexander Acosta, a pass for not being as obviously objectionable as Andrew Puzder, citing his deference to Trump’s decision to roll back the fiduciary rule as one of many reasons to keep close tabs on his actions.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy