Stuxnet Worm in Iran Could have Triggered ‘Chernobyl’

Stuxnet Worm in Iran Could have Triggered ‘Chernobyl’

Stuxnet Worm in Iran Could have Triggered ‘Chernobyl’

An intelligence report says the Stuxnet computer worm deployed by Israel and/or the US on Iran’s nuclear program could have had catastrophic consequences.


Eric Alterman may still be full of “joy” over the US and/or Israeli deployment of the Stuxnet computer worm to disable or upset Iran’s nuclear program. But an intelligence report obtained by AP says that the worm could have had catastrophic consequences. Reports AP:

The control systems of Iran’s Bushehr nuclear plant have been penetrated by a computer worm unleashed last year, according to a foreign intelligence report that warns of a possible Chernobyl-like disaster once the site becomes fully operational.

With control systems disabled by the virus, the reactor would have the force of a “small nuclear bomb,” it said.

“The minimum possible damage would be a meltdown of the reactor,” it says. “However, external damage and massive environmental destruction could also occur…similar to the Chernobyl disaster.”

Meanwhile, the British secretary of defense—they call it “defence” in England—has warned hyperbolically that Iran might have a bomb by 2012, i.e., next year, even though the Israelis themselves are saying that it will be 2015 at the earliest. The secretary, Liam Fox, criticized Meir Dagan, then the retiring head of the Mossad, who he said erred by suggesting that Iran is not that close to building a bomb. “We should therefore be very clear that it is entirely possible that Iran may be on the 2012 end of that spectrum and act in accordance with that warning,” said Liam Fox, who is no fox at all.

Like this Blog Post? Read it on the Nation’s free iPhone App, NationNow.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy