A Shifting Debate on Afghanistan

A Shifting Debate on Afghanistan

Eight years after the war in Afghanistan began, the issue of how to endit is finally getting some traction in Congress.

No longer is Congressman Jim McGovern’s bill with over 100 cosponsors demanding an exit strategy from the only game in town. Nor are Senators Russ Feingold and Bernie Sanders alone among their colleagues in calling for a flexible timetable for withdrawal or a national conversation on Afghanistan strategy.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Eight years after the war in Afghanistan began, the issue of how to end it is finally getting some traction in Congress.

No longer is Congressman Jim McGovern’s bill with over 100 cosponsors demanding an exit strategy from the only game in town. Nor are Senators Russ Feingold and Bernie Sanders alone among their colleagues in calling for a flexible timetable for withdrawal or a national conversation on Afghanistan strategy.

In these past few weeks–after a rigged election that will likely leave the corrupt Karzai government in power, and polls showing Americans suffering war fatigue during these economic hard times of jobless recovery–more centrist Democrats have started questioning astrategy of escalation in Afghanistan. Among them, Senator Carl Levin, Chairman of the Armed Services Committee, came out against an increase in troop levels. Also, Senator Diane Feinstein, Chairman of the Intelligence Committee, has called on the administration to provide a specific date for withdrawal.

Even Senate Majority Whip Richard Durbin–perhaps the President’s closest friend and ally in Congress–said, "I think, at this point, sending additional troops would not be theright thing to do."

It’s clear that we are seeing the beginning signs of a significant shift in the debate.

With the Obama administration not expected to take a position on sending more troops for weeks–probably not until after a health care bill is hammered out–now is a critical time to lobby legislators and the administration for an exit strategy, no additional troops and a timetable in Afghanistan. There is a particular need to get a bill moving in the Senate that calls for an exit strategy similar to Rep. McGovern’s legislation in the House–ask your Senator to offer one.

Also, check out The Nation and Brave New Films October 2 screening in New York City of Rethink Afghanistan–a documentary which includes interviews with over 100 experts ranging from former CIA officers, NGO officials, Afghan MPs and Afghan women rights activists. Rep. McGovern will participate in a panel discussion following the movie. More details will be available next week at TheNation.com.

This is a critical time to craft and mobilize around an alternative strategy based on regional diplomacy and development, targeted counterterrorism efforts and intelligence sharing. The war in Afghanistan is draining resources that are vital to President Obama’s goals for an economic recovery and social justice at home, while destabilizing Pakistan and distracting us from other critical international initiatives such as the Middle East Peace process and a regional diplomacy in South Asia.

To borrow a phrase from the President: "Nothing can stand in the way of the power of millions of voices calling for change." It’s time to call your legislators and demand change in Afghanistan–an exit strategy, no additional troops and a date for withdrawal.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x