Sherrod Brown Is the First Senator to Say ‘No’ to Jeff Sessions

Sherrod Brown Is the First Senator to Say ‘No’ to Jeff Sessions

Sherrod Brown Is the First Senator to Say ‘No’ to Jeff Sessions

“I have serious concerns that Senator Sessions’ record on civil rights is at direct odds with the task of promoting justice and equality for all.”

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

People of conscience, regardless of party or ideology, are going to have to reject President-elect Donald Trump’s nomination of Alabama Senator Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III to become the the 84th attorney general of the United States.

As the Alabama State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People—which knows a thing or two about Sessions and his record—declares with regard to the prospect that the extremely right-wing politician might become the nation’s chief law-enforcement officer: “This Can’t Happen!

“Despite 30 years of our nation moving forward on inclusion and against hate, Jeff Sessions has failed to change his ways,” Alabama State Conference President Benard Simelton says of the Trump-allied senator whose nomination to serve as a federal judge was rejected 31 years ago by a Republican-led Senate Judiciary Committee. That rejection followed a contentious hearing that focused on accusations of racial insensitivity and expressions of concern about the nominee’s inability to serve as a “fair and impartial” jurist.

“He’s been a threat to desegregation and the Voting Rights Act and remains a threat to all of our civil rights, including the right to live without the fear of police brutality,” the head of the Alabama NAACP says of Sessions.

That’s a loud and clear “no” to Sessions.

And it has been echoed by national civil-rights and social-justice leaders, including NAACP President/CEO Cornell William Brooks, who says, “As a matter of conscience and conviction, we can neither be mute nor mumble our opposition to Senator Jefferson Beauregard Sessions becoming Attorney General of the United States. Senator Sessions has callously ignored the reality of voter suppression but zealously prosecuted innocent civil rights leaders on trumped up charges of voter fraud. As an opponent of the vote, he can’t be trusted to be the chief law enforcement officer for voting rights.”

The case for a “no” vote by the Senate has been made. Now, it is time for senators to recognize that their hyper-conservative colleague simply should not be given control of the Department of Justice.

The first senator to do just that is Ohio Democrat Sherrod Brown, who as a state official, member of the US House and the US Senate has established a record of standing on principle on issues of economic and social justice.

Brown met with Sessions last Wednesday, reflected on what he had heard, and announced his decision late in the week: “The U.S. Attorney General’s job is to enforce laws that protect the rights of every American. I have serious concerns that Senator Sessions’ record on civil rights is at direct odds with the task of promoting justice and equality for all, and I cannot support his nomination.”

After discussing the Alabaman’s record on civil rights and opinions on a range of issues—including the need to restore the full protections of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and what can be done to improve police-community relations in cities across the country—Brown said, “Now, more than ever, we need leaders who can bring Americans together to improve police-community relations, ensure that all Americans have access to the ballot, and reform our criminal justice system.”

Brown gave Sessions a chance, but he wasn’t reassured that Alabaman would meet that reasonable and necessary standard. Brown’s assessment is sound. It should be echoed and embraced by his fellow senators.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x