Sestak vs. Specter

Sestak vs. Specter

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

The debate over issues like President Obama’s stimulus, healthcarereform and climate change have revealed fault lines in the country, butalso within the Democratic party. In the stimulus fight, longtimeRepublican Pennsylvania Senator Arlen Specter backed President Obama. InApril, Senator Specter switched parties, edging Democrats closer to aso-called “super-majority” in the Senate and roiling Washington. But forprogressives, is Senator Specter an ally, or someone who switchedparties out of political convenience?

Tomorrow, Senator Specter will face political bloggers, Pennsylvaniavoters and his primary opponent, Democratic Congressman Joe Sestak, in aforum held as part of the “Netroots Nation” yearlyconference of progressive bloggers and online activists. TheSpecter-Sestak debatewith be co-moderated by The Nation‘s own Net MovementCorrespondent Ari Melber and Pennsylvania blogger Susie Madrak, and livestreaming here atTheNation.com at 11 AM Friday, EST.

In 2007, Netroots Nation (then “Yearly Kos”) was the site of one ofthe most thoughtful, informed and vigorous debates of the Presidentialprimary cycle. By bringing together Sestak and Specter — who areengagedin what may be the defining race of the 2010 Democratic primary season–Netroots Nation is keeping online citizen engagement at the forefront ofour modern political process, and taking head-on the future of theDemocratic party.

Madrak and Melber have been collectingquestions online for weeks, andare expected to address both National and Pennsylvania-specificconcerns. In a unique online feedback forum, Melber and Madrak areasking people to vote questions up or down, as they consider what to askthe candidates. Here are some of the leaders:

What is your position on climate change legislation?

Will you vote for a healthcare reform bill with a strong publicoption?

Will you vote for “cloture,” a process that allows up or down votingand only 51 votes instead of 60 for passage on key bills like healthcareand climate change?

The question of cloture is an implicit challenge to Sestak and Specterto put a stake in the ground about their allegiance to progressivecauses: Does bipartisanship and Senate process trump passage ofprogressive legislation? It is an important question, and one thatSpecter will quickly face when healthcare reform comes up for a votenext month.

The forum should be lively, and we will have a recap afterwards. Butwe do hope you’ll join us here at TheNation.com tomorrow at 11 AM andwatch it happen live.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x