Rutgers Team Is an Instrument for Change

Rutgers Team Is an Instrument for Change

Rutgers Team Is an Instrument for Change

The fact that the media is astonished that the Rutgers athletes are articulate and smart is a tragedy.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

This article was originally published by The Women’s Media Center.

C. Vivian Stringer, the coach of the Imus-defamed college basketball team, got it exactly right this morning on the CBS Early Show, calling her young women an “instrument of change.” As the story develops, more and more cogs in the Imus machine are examined. Today, money and media get their turn under the bright lights.

The Wall Street Journal weighed in as several sponsors–Proctor and Gamble and Staples among them, pulled their advertising from the Imus show. The New York Times took a closer look at Imus’s financial clout–generating, sources seem to indicate, more than $50 million dollars a year for CBS and MSNBC; Imus himself reportedly just signed a five-year, $10 million a year contract. The question raised was whether or not the proposed meeting with ten young women in New Jersey could save this multimillion-dollar empire–not only for Imus, but also for CBS and MSNBC. The whole concept of girl power takes on new dimensions.

The Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, a 200,000 member African American women’s organization, stepped up the pressure yesterday. They joined the call for the Imus team to be fired and also asked all members to divest themselves of any CBS, NBC and related companies’ stock, which would include NBC partner Microsoft. Its action followed requests from other groups to boycott sponsors remaining in the Imus rotation.

As for the media, it can be partially blamed for gushing over the team members after their news conference between classes at Rutgers yesterday. The fact that America seemed to be astonished that they are articulate and smart is another tragedy, one the media participates in crafting every day as it perpetuates stereotypes by refusing to tell the real stories of women and girls.

Being ill-informed no doubt led the hapless Imus down his path of ill-advised comments–and yesterday he seemed to be digging himself deeper in the trench by suggesting that he hadn’t called the women anything they and other black women aren’t called by African American men. That’s a story the media loves. Repeatedly yesterday African American spokespersons were asked “What about the rappers–why don’t you do anything about them?” One response was on the mark: We try, but can’t get media coverage–no one is interested. They are interested in Imus.

Mainstream media seems to have little interest in telling the good stories.

As team captain Essence Carson asked yesterday–where was the media when the team was making history, and why did it take an insult to bring them the attention they deserved? To hear the surprised praise being heaped on these young women is almost as upsetting as Imus’ remarks–the world seemed to expect so little, to know so little about accomplishment in the black community.

And, of course, the roving eye of breaking news turns itself on the media giants so hungry for this story–as Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson repeatedly point out, as they have for years, the networks’ failure in achieving diversity. One recent report puts the percentage of network stories on the evening news covered by minorities at 15 percent. Less and less do we see minorities, especially women, in high profile positions.

The story is gaining speed, rather than dissipating. If this works out as it should, there are more men in cowboy hats than Imus who should be worried.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x