The Rockets’ Red Glare

The Rockets’ Red Glare

The fierce tableau of smoke and flames that US bombs created over Baghdad–a visual message of America’s awesomely destructive power–brought to mind Shelley’s meditation on an ancient ruin, wh


The fierce tableau of smoke and flames that US bombs created over Baghdad–a visual message of America’s awesomely destructive power–brought to mind Shelley’s meditation on an ancient ruin, where a fallen pedestal bore the inscription: “My name is Ozymandias, king of kings:/ Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!” Ozymandias’s stern visage lay shattered in the sand. The US strategy of “shock and awe” was intended to intimidate Iraqis into surrendering, but it did not succeed, any more than the ancient ruler’s arrogant proclamation protected his imperium. It is already obvious that Americans were grossly misled by the official expectations of another easy triumph for US power, but there is also the chilling recognition that war planners themselves may have been seduced by the propaganda. Empires, it seems, are eternally vulnerable to hubris.

Americans have become accustomed to quick, low-casualty wars with too-easy claims of virtuous results, but now they’re getting the real thing, bloody and ambiguous and randomly cruel. We were assured that our advanced technologies–precision bombing and digital communications–would let us minimize American casualties and spare Iraqi civilians. But already there have been terrible errors–including, it appears, the bombing of a Baghdad shopping area that left dozens dead or wounded. Such incidents are rapidly eroding any support that may have existed in the Arab world for the US objective of removing Saddam Hussein. Instead, they arouse intense anger against the United States–anger that’s likely to grow regardless of the war’s outcome.

The way these events play out could have a great impact at a time when fundamental questions are already on the table. A Brooklyn musician named Kyp Malone told the New York Times that he mourns the American losses but wonders, “Even if it’s quick and easy, I don’t know that I want to live in a world where America can just roll over any country it wants.” Well said. Do the American people really want an empire? That question is raised by the marching protesters though not much in official circles. Yet under the “defense” strategy enunciated by Bush, Iraq is only the first battlefield of many.

The other big question, voiced by the swelling marches around the world, is about the legitimacy of war itself. In the global outcries, chronicled beginning on page 12, it is possible to discern demands for a new standard of conduct–not pacifism per se but a far more demanding threshold for the use of force, especially by the most powerful nations against weaker ones. Certainly, diverse populations and some leading governments have judged that America’s unilateral war is illegitimate. Perhaps we are witnessing the beginnings of a broader movement that will eventually compel statesmen to reconsider the inherited rules of war among nations and to fashion new ones that are more moral and suitable to a globalizing world.

Continuation of the bloodshed and suffering is not inevitable. An effort is under way to call the United Nations General Assembly into session under the “Uniting for Peace” precedent to seek ways to end the conflict, and while Washington is said to be doing everything it can to block such action, smaller countries have already shown they can stand up to bullying. Other routes, too, must be explored. The alternative is to allow the tragedy to proceed to its awful conclusion.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy