Rethinking Afghanistan: Is Obama’s Strategy a Dead End?

Rethinking Afghanistan: Is Obama’s Strategy a Dead End?

Rethinking Afghanistan: Is Obama’s Strategy a Dead End?

Unified in their opposition to the war in Iraq, liberal and antiwar groups are finding little common ground when it comes to Obama’s escalation in Afghanistan.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

type=”application/x-shockwave-flash” width=”320″ height=”240″
allowscriptaccess=”always” allowfullscreen=”true”>

The Obama administration has laid out its strategy for stabilizing and
rebuilding Afghanistan: sending an additional 21,000 troops,
strengthening the army and police forces, and establishing what Obama
calls clear metrics for evaluating progress. Not everyone agrees. Robert
Greenwald of Brave New Films
says it is a flawed approach and is calling for a US policy that does
not rely on military force.

But Obama is winning support from his liberal base, particularly the
Center for American Progress whose recent report, <a
href=”http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/03/
sustainable_afghanistan.html”>Sustainable Security in Afghanistan,
calls for even more troops than Obama has pledged. Organizations and
individuals who opposed Bush’s policies in Iraq have voiced their
support for Obama’s war. Robert Greenwald, Terry Rockefeller of <a
href=”http://www.peacefultomorrows.org/”>September Eleventh Families for
Peaceful Tomorrows, Kathleen Foster director of Afghan Women: A
History of Struggle, and Sean Duggan of the <a
href=”http://www.americanprogress.org/”>Center for American Progress
discuss the future role of the US in Afghanistan.

For more on the program and archives visit <a
href=”http://www.grittv.org”>grittv.org.

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x