Rethinking Afghanistan: Is Obama’s Strategy a Dead End?

Rethinking Afghanistan: Is Obama’s Strategy a Dead End?

Rethinking Afghanistan: Is Obama’s Strategy a Dead End?

Unified in their opposition to the war in Iraq, liberal and antiwar groups are finding little common ground when it comes to Obama’s escalation in Afghanistan.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

type=”application/x-shockwave-flash” width=”320″ height=”240″
allowscriptaccess=”always” allowfullscreen=”true”>

The Obama administration has laid out its strategy for stabilizing and
rebuilding Afghanistan: sending an additional 21,000 troops,
strengthening the army and police forces, and establishing what Obama
calls clear metrics for evaluating progress. Not everyone agrees. Robert
Greenwald of Brave New Films
says it is a flawed approach and is calling for a US policy that does
not rely on military force.

But Obama is winning support from his liberal base, particularly the
Center for American Progress whose recent report, <a
href=”http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/03/
sustainable_afghanistan.html”>Sustainable Security in Afghanistan,
calls for even more troops than Obama has pledged. Organizations and
individuals who opposed Bush’s policies in Iraq have voiced their
support for Obama’s war. Robert Greenwald, Terry Rockefeller of <a
href=”http://www.peacefultomorrows.org/”>September Eleventh Families for
Peaceful Tomorrows, Kathleen Foster director of Afghan Women: A
History of Struggle, and Sean Duggan of the <a
href=”http://www.americanprogress.org/”>Center for American Progress
discuss the future role of the US in Afghanistan.

For more on the program and archives visit <a
href=”http://www.grittv.org”>grittv.org.

Support independent journalism that exposes oligarchs and profiteers


Donald Trump’s cruel and chaotic second term is just getting started. In his first month back in office, Trump and his lackey Elon Musk (or is it the other way around?) have proven that nothing is safe from sacrifice at the altar of unchecked power and riches.

Only robust independent journalism can cut through the noise and offer clear-eyed reporting and analysis based on principle and conscience. That’s what The Nation has done for 160 years and that’s what we’re doing now.

Our independent journalism doesn’t allow injustice to go unnoticed or unchallenged—nor will we abandon hope for a better world. Our writers, editors, and fact-checkers are working relentlessly to keep you informed and empowered when so much of the media fails to do so out of credulity, fear, or fealty.

The Nation has seen unprecedented times before. We draw strength and guidance from our history of principled progressive journalism in times of crisis, and we are committed to continuing this legacy today.

We’re aiming to raise $25,000 during our Spring Fundraising Campaign to ensure that we have the resources to expose the oligarchs and profiteers attempting to loot our republic. Stand for bold independent journalism and donate to support The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel

Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x