Resolution for 2016: Let’s Have Lots More Presidential Debates

Resolution for 2016: Let’s Have Lots More Presidential Debates

Resolution for 2016: Let’s Have Lots More Presidential Debates

Robert Reich is petitioning the DNC to open up the process. Let’s make this the start of a fight for more debates in the primary season and this fall.


The last Democratic presidential debate of 2015 was held on the Saturday night before Christmas. Viewership was roughly one-quarter that of the first Republican debate and dramatically lower than all of the Republican debates.

In other words, the Democrats lost the competition for viewers—and for the framing of issues and ideas for the 2016 presidential competition.

That’s bad for the Democratic Party and its candidates. It’s also bad for a body politic that requires more than the junk-food diet offered up by Donald Trump and most of his fellow contenders for the Republican presidential nod.

So former secretary of labor Robert Reich, one of the most respected independent progressive figures within the Democratic orbit, has decided to do something about the problem.

Working with the activist group Democracy for America, Reich is circulating a petition that reads:

Saturday night’s [December 19] Democratic presidential primary debate was striking. It was all about substance and logic—in sharp contrast to Republican debates that have been all name-calling and posturing.

It was the kind of debate that could have really gotten voters excited about the Democratic Party. But because of when it was scheduled, almost nobody saw it.

And the bad scheduling looks like it is just going to keep getting worse. The next Democratic debate will be Sunday, January 17—on a three-day holiday weekend, scheduled at the same time as a major NFL playoff game.

Tell [Democratic National Committee chair] Debbie Wasserman Schultz and the DNC to schedule additional debates.

More than 100,000 Americans have signed the petition—which echoes calls from former Maryland governor Martin O’Malley and Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders for more debates—and the number is rising rapidly.

Reich is making an important point as a prominent progressive who served as a member of former president Bill Clinton’s cabinet and who has emerged as a hero of activists aligned with what is frequently referred to as “the Elizabeth Warren wing of the Democratic Party.”

“The Democratic National Committee has scheduled fewer than half the debates the Republicans have scheduled, and also put them on weekends when few people are likely to watch (the next one will be on a Sunday during the NFL playoffs, during the three-day MLK Jr. birthday weekend). Again by contrast, the Republicans have made sure their debates are in prime time,” he explains. “As a result, Republicans are getting lots of free TV time for their right-wing ideas and brainless policies, while Democrats get little time for ideas and policies that should be front and center. Republican debates are making the headlines, while Democratic debates are buried. Republican lies and misinformation shape the public’s understanding of what’s at stake in the 2016 election, while real issues and the important facts are sidelined.”

The fight for more debates ought not to be limited to the Democratic primary process.

Activists should also be fighting for more debates once the parties have nominated their candidates for president.

The Commission on Presidential Debates, a joint project of Democratic and Republican party insiders, currently has control of the fall presidential debates—along with the television networks. The commission has a history of narrowing the number of debates, limiting the number of candidates who can participate and selecting moderators and panelists who constrain rather than expand the range of debate.

Now is the time to start fighting to break the stranglehold of the commission and to open up the fall debates. Some groups are already working in this direction. There’s even a petition that calls for the commission to “Include All Qualified Candidates in 2016 Presidential Debates.”

Debates are an essential feature of democracy, and we should all resolve to fight for more of them in 2016.

Thank you for reading The Nation

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read, just one of the many incisive, deeply-reported articles we publish daily. Now more than ever, we need fearless journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media.

Throughout this critical election year and a time of media austerity and renewed campus activism and rising labor organizing, independent journalism that gets to the heart of the matter is more critical than ever before. Donate right now and help us hold the powerful accountable, shine a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug, and build a more just and equitable future.

For nearly 160 years, The Nation has stood for truth, justice, and moral clarity. As a reader-supported publication, we are not beholden to the whims of advertisers or a corporate owner. But it does take financial resources to report on stories that may take weeks or months to properly investigate, thoroughly edit and fact-check articles, and get our stories into the hands of readers.

Donate today and stand with us for a better future. Thank you for being a supporter of independent journalism.

Ad Policy