In Rap Battle, Stewart Demolishes O’Reilly on O’Reilly Factor (VIDEO)

In Rap Battle, Stewart Demolishes O’Reilly on O’Reilly Factor (VIDEO)

In Rap Battle, Stewart Demolishes O’Reilly on O’Reilly Factor (VIDEO)

Jon Stewart paid a visit to Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly to debate Fox News’ hip hop double standard.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

"I’m like a shot a Levittown right in your ass, like a B-12—boom!"

Those were Jon Stewart’s last words to Bill O’Reilly in his guest appearance on Monday night’s "O’Reilly Factor," in a virtuoso duel where comedy eviscerated farce.

The two highly rated cable stars squared off over one of the more inane controversies in a political season full of inane controversies—whether the White House was wrong to invite the socially conscious rapper Common to perform at a poetry slam. If you haven’t heard:

Basically, (some) conservatives said Common’s music was vile because he questioned murder convictions and police authority. Also, he has been seen R.W.B—rapping while black. Then, Liberals (and fact-checkers) retorted that Common is a conscious and even cuddly musician, with credentials that include recording a pro-life duet with Lauryn Hill and starring in Tina Fey’s last movie. Plus, GOP administrations have hosted edgier musicians who have also questioned murder convictions and police authority. 

So when O’Reilly doubled down on his hypocritical case and challenged Stewart to come debate the nontroversy, it was a no-brainer.

In two short segments, O’Reilly walked through his case, responded to factual charges of hypocrisy with some fairly sad parsing and then, when desperate, with rank "pettifogging," to use a term bandied by both men.  Meanwhile, the "Daily Show" anchor’s rebuttals were striking because, even in this casual mode on a minor item, he was more persuasive than the vast majority of people who are called on to represent a progressive view on TV.

Stewart really seized control of the terms of debate near the end of the first segment, when he asked whether O’Reilly would revoke Bono’s White House guest pass, issued by several administrations, because of his song about Leonard Peltier. "It’s the exact same thing: A guy convicted of killing a law enforcement official, no?" asked Stewart, adding "Boo-yah!" to emphasize the point. (He salted his rhetoric with rap slang throughout the debate.) And that’s when O’Reilly started to melt. "Did Bono, did he actually come out and say that [Peltier] was innocent?" O’Reilly asked, groping for a distinction. "No, I think he was raising questions about it," O’Reilly offered. "Now who’s pettifogging?," Stewart countered, "I can’t even see you, through your pettifog!"

Stewart closed with a critique that is familiar to Fox’s critics, but may be worthwhile for O’Reilly’s audience to hear directly, noting that Fox operates a "selective outrage machine" that kicks into gear "only when it suits the narrative that suits them."

Both interview segments are below:

Like this blog post? Read it on The Nation’s free iPhone App, NationNow.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x