Radio Waves

Radio Waves

The State of the Radio Union.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

It has been more than a quarter-century since Elvis Costello first spit out the biting lyrics of his song “Radio Radio”: “The radio is in the hands of such a lot of fools/Tryin’ to anaesthetize the way that you feel.” But while Costello and the punks and New Wavers did their best to push back against increasing homogenization, the promise of radio–long the most democratic of the traditional mass media–continued to be squandered. Big media corporations and their allies in Congress and on the Federal Communications Commission quietly rewrote the rules during the 1980s and ’90s to clear away barriers to consolidation, thereby ushering in an era in which the news was dumbed down, dissent was stifled and the music all started to sound the same.

But a funny thing happened on the way to the death of radio: A new generation of progressives began to fight back. As Garrison Keillor says here, “Liberals actually enjoy living in a free society; tuning in to hear an echo is not our idea of a good time.” Responses to the collapse of diversity that followed passage of the 1996 Telecommunications Act haven’t made radio what it should be, especially at the local level. But activists have restored hope that radio might again become a vehicle for spreading democracy and culture. Most Americans can now listen to Democracy Now! with Amy Goodman (profiled here by Lizzy Ratner) on Pacifica, community or NPR stations, as well as on public-access cable TV, Free Speech TV, shortwave radio and the Internet. And in more than fifty communities across the country, including sixteen of the top radio twenty, they can tune in to Air America (profiled here by Nicholas von Hoffman) and hear Al Franken, Randi Rhodes, Janeane Garofalo and others offer a bracing counter to the ranting of Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity. North Dakota populist Ed Schultz is heard on more than eighty stations, along with the XM and Sirius satellite networks. And in national markets, NPR offers an alternative, although, as Scott Sherman notes here, it is not nearly as spirited or edgy an option as it once was. In a dozen states, mainly in the upper Midwest and West, community organizations and activists, working in consortiums like the Minnesota News Connection and the Northern Rockies News Service, have begun producing and distributing quality news and public affairs programs to fill the gap created by the shuttering of local news operations.

It’s too early to say that a corner has been turned: Consolidation continues, and with it the squeezing out not just of ideas but of the vast majority of recording artists and some of the most vibrant genres of regional music. But it’s getting harder for big media to win the important fights, thanks to a burgeoning media reform movement detailed here by Robert W. McChesney, John Nichols and Ben Scott. That movement has prevented the implementation of an industry-backed restructuring of ownership rules and is winning allies for moves to address both the damage done by consolidation and consolidation itself. One means for doing that is low-power FM radio, whose leading champion is the Prometheus Radio Project (profiled here by Rick Karr). The reform movement has also prompted debates about regulation of satellite radio, podcasting and other new technologies.

There is still a lot of work to do. But the combination of programming innovations, new technologies and a media reform movement that has the clout not just to prevent the bad but promote the good might yet put meaning into another line from Elvis Costello’s old song: “Radio is a sound salvation.”

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x