Poor Little Rich ‘Class Warfare’ Victim

Poor Little Rich ‘Class Warfare’ Victim

Poor Little Rich ‘Class Warfare’ Victim

Tea Party Congressman John Fleming doesn’t get why he should be taxed more on the $400,000 he has left after “feeding my family.”

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Add Louisiana Congressman John Fleming to the list of anti-tax Republicans who whine that getting by on a six- or seven-figure income isn’t as easy as you five-figure folk may think.

Back in July, Representative Sean Duffy (R-WI) shared that he struggles to pay his bills on his $174,000 Congressional salary (more than three times the median household income in his Wisconsin county). Today, on Chris Jansing’s MSNBC show, multimillionaire Fleming  explained in personal terms why Obama’s plan to raise taxes on millionaires is so unfair.

Fleming, whose flock of Subway shops and UPS stores brought in $6.3 million last year, said that after expenses he nets about $600,000—and “by the time I feed my family, I have maybe $400,000 left over to invest in new locations, upgrade my locations, buy more equipment.” 

“So,” Jansing asked, “you’re saying that if you have to pay more in taxes you would get rid of some of those employees?” Fleming never answered the question.

She tried again: “You do understand, Congressman, that the average person out there who’s making forty, fifty, sixty thousand dollars a year, when they hear that you have only $400,000 left over, it’s not exactly a sympathetic position.”

“Well, again,” he said, “class warfare’s never created a job.”

Neither have record-low taxes on the rich, as ten years of Bush tax cuts should have proven once and for all. Finally, in his speech today on why we must raise taxes on the wealthy to reduce the deficit, Obama came up with just the right, succinct retort: “This isn’t class warfare. It’s math.”

Watch:

 

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x