The Political Costs of Wal-Mart

The Political Costs of Wal-Mart

Cozying up to Wal-Mart may cost a New Jersey mayor his job.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Playing towel boy to Wal-Mart may cost Edison, New Jersey, Mayor George Spadoro his job. In a local battle over a proposed Wal-Mart store, the Democratic mayor has alienated many residents by taking the company’s side. (The neighbors aren’t pleased, either; an adjacent town is suing Edison over the project, fearing it will greatly worsen traffic problems.) Edison’s labor leaders don’t usually get involved in local Democratic primary politics, but the Teamsters, United Food and Commercial Workers and the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union are throwing their weight behind Spadoro’s opponent, Jun Choi. An education activist, Choi is the more progressive candidate, but his opposition to the Edison Wal-Mart–and support for more sustainable development–is giving his campaign a unique momentum. The primary is on June 7–if you live in the area, check out www.junchoi.com/volunteer.htm. Whoever wins the primary in this Democratic town is likely to be mayor.

If Spadoro does lose, his fate should serve as a cautionary tale to other politicians who are too spineless, misguided or downright whorish to stand up to Wal-Mart. Maryland Governor Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. falls in the latter category. Ehrlich, as Katrina vanden Heuvel reported a few weeks ago, is vetoing a bill that would force Wal-Mart either to increase spending on employee health insurance or reimburse the state’s taxpayers for the public-assistance expenses incurred by the company’s workers. Luckily the bill has enough votes in the legislature to override Ehrlich’s veto, but the material context for the governor’s pathetic antics hasn’t escaped scrutiny. As reported in the Washington Post, Ehrlich recently received a $4,000 contribution from Wal-Mart and was the beneficiary of a $1,000-per-head fundraiser hosted by the company. Wal-Mart Watch is urging people to sign a petition calling on him to send the money back to Wal-Mart.

An urgent message from the Editors

As the editors of The Nation, it’s not usually our role to fundraise. Today, however, we’re putting out a special appeal to our readers, because there are only hours left in 2025 and we’re still $20,000 away from our goal of $75,000. We need you to help close this gap. 

Your gift to The Nation directly supports the rigorous, confrontational, and truly independent journalism that our country desperately needs in these dark times.

2025 was a terrible year for press freedom in the United States. Trump launched personal attack after personal attack against journalists, newspapers, and broadcasters across the country, including multiple billion-dollar lawsuits. The White House even created a government website to name and shame outlets that report on the administration with anti-Trump bias—an exercise in pure intimidation.

The Nation will never give in to these threats and will never be silenced. In fact, we’re ramping up for a year of even more urgent and powerful dissent. 

With the 2026 elections on the horizon, and knowing Trump’s history of false claims of fraud when he loses, we’re going to be working overtime with writers like Elie Mystal, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Jeet Heer, Kali Holloway, Katha Pollitt, and Chris Lehmann to cut through the right’s spin, lies, and cover-ups as the year develops.

If you donate before midnight, your gift will be matched dollar for dollar by a generous donor. We hope you’ll make our work possible with a donation. Please, don’t wait any longer.

In solidarity,

The Nation Editors

Ad Policy
x