Paul Rips Gingrich, Perry Wants to Reinvade Iraq, Hunstman Speak Chinese, Romney Wins

Paul Rips Gingrich, Perry Wants to Reinvade Iraq, Hunstman Speak Chinese, Romney Wins

Paul Rips Gingrich, Perry Wants to Reinvade Iraq, Hunstman Speak Chinese, Romney Wins

A bizarre and unfocused debate, where his opponents seem to forget the point, cements Romney’s frontrunner status.


 

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Ron Paul reaffirmed his view that Newt Gingrich is a chickenhawk.

Rick Santorum called Ron Paul a liar.

Jon Huntsman explained to his fellow contenders that his marriage was not threatened by civil unions.

Gingrich said Barack Obama was "sincere" in his determination to create "a radical European socialist model" of governance.

Rick Perry proposed reinvading Iraq. Seriously.

Perry said that if he wasn’t debating, he’d be at the shooting range. Most of the rest of the candidates said they would be watching football — except for Paul, who said he’d be reading an economics text. Seriously.

Then the six men who would be president sent the better part of Saturday night’s debate arguing about contraception.

It was drab and uninspired debate. And so it should come as no surprise that the winner was the drab and uninspired frontrunner, Mitt Romney.

Indeed, said ABC News’ Jake Tapper, "It was almost as if they (the other candidates) were not aware that Mitt Romney is the frontrunner."

Instead of taking Romney down a few pegs on the eve of a primary polls that polls suggest he is likely to win, the other candidates pretty much gave Romney a pass. Indeed, even when they tried to damage him, it was with ineffectual jibes — like Santorum suggestion that the former governor and organizer of the Olympics is too much of a manager.

The only real dust-up between Romney and one of his challengers was a late-in-the-debate clash with Huntsman.

And Romney won that one. Big time.

Huntsman scored Romney for some protectionist statements regarding China.

Romney shot back that, while he and the other candidates on the stage were fighting the Obama administration’s policies in recent years, Huntsman was "implementing" them as the U.S. ambassador to China.

Ouch.

Huntsman responded by speaking Chinese.

Double ouch.

Romney walked away stronger than he went in.

He also got off the best line of the night.

As the most arcane Republican presidential debate wrestled with a question about federal regulation of birth control, Romney wisely gave up and turned to Paul, the Texas congressman who has positioned himself as the most consistent defender of the Constitution in Washington.

"You can ask your Constitutionalist here.," said Romney. "I don’t know whether a state has a right to ban contraception. No state wants to… it’s kind of a silly thing I think."

Paul assured Romney and the rest that the 4th Amendment protects privacy.

But Romney was right. The whole debate was "kind of a silly thing."

And he walked away looking kind of like the likely nominee of the Republican Party.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x