Palazzo Papers, Anyone?

Palazzo Papers, Anyone?

As Prime Minister-elect Romano Prodi take the reins of power, Italians should seek evidence of Berlusconi’s true role in the run-up to the Iraq War.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

How do you say “Sore Loserman” in Italian? Silvio Berlusconi.

Despite outspending his opponent, using his media companies to get far more coverage than allowed and rewriting the election laws in the last year to gut his opponents, Prime Minister Berlusconi was defeated last week by Romano Prodi and the center-left Union coalition.

It was close–only 25,000 votes separated the two coalitions, out of 38 million cast–but the Union’s advantage was decisive, winning both houses. In addition, the election was mostly about Berlusconi–and most Italians just said basta.

This is good news for the international antiwar movement–Italians rejected one of the pro-war poodles (Berlusconi was one of the “Killer B’s,” along with Bush and Blair), and Prodi has promised to bring the troops home “as soon as possible.”

Yet in the past week, Berlusconi has refused to concede; tried to initiate a “grand coalition,” promised to “resist” if denied and threatened to bring down the new government, though it has yet to take office; claimed electoral fraud, despite the inconvenient fact that his own government was in charge of the election; suggested that he and his coalition partners were the “moral victors” (in the foul-mouthed and flamboyant Silvio’s case, a funny choice of words); and one of his allies even accused foreign postal systems of subverting overseas ballots.

Nor has George Bush, ever busy, found the time to call Prime Minister-elect Prodi and congratulate him–even from Camp David this weekend, where he was hiding out because Cindy Sheehan was in Crawford. Nor has the Pope managed to pick up the phone. Hmmm…

Being an election-fraud aficionado, I find this highly entertaining. But I hope and trust that my Italian brothers and sisters will keep one eye on the electoral prize and the other eye on the transition period.

Here’s why: When Prime Minister José María Aznar’s party was ousted in Spain, Aznar’s team immediately shredded the paper files and erased the hard drives before José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero took over. Aznar doubtless wanted no evidence left about the truth of his maneuverings after the Madrid bombing, or of his dealings with the Bush Administration on the Iraq War. Perhaps Aznar has already called Berlusconi with that reminder, since it is doubtful that Silvio would want any concealed documents released in the coming months that would remind Italy and the world of his up-to-now-secret conversations with Bush and Blair prior to the start of the Iraq War.

In two weeks, it will be one year since the Downing Street memo leaked in London, thanks to journalist Michael Smith and some anonymous dedicated public servant(s). That memo, and the ones that followed, have made a huge impact on the public’s perception of the dishonesty and untruthfulness of both George Bush and Tony Blair. Think of it: A memo leaked in London had an impact on both sides of the Atlantic–and still is, judging from Bush’s and Blair’s disapproval ratings.

Were similar memos to be released by the new government of Italy, it would solidify the truth about the lies that were told by these three leaders to dupe their nations into an illegal, immoral, pre-emptive war on a nation that was not an imminent threat.

So here’s my appeal: Please, Italian civil servants–make copies of all memos. Put your files on disks. Create alternate folders. Keep the truth from being shredded and erased. Let the people know if and when the Berlusconi crowd puts pressure on you to erase the prewar history, the forged Niger papers, the renditions. And then share that truth, soon, with the rest of the world.

Since the Italian prime minister’s residence is the Palazzo Chigi, maybe we’ll call the Italian version of the Downing Street memo the Palazzo Papers.

Whatever we call them, it sure would be interesting to see them posted on Italian websites.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x