The Oscars Fails Its Own Vision Test

The Oscars Fails Its Own Vision Test

Aside from being a celebration of xenophobia and misogyny, the Oscars also failed to pay tribute to Lupe Ontiveros and Russell Means.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket


Best actress nominee Quvenzhané Wallis hits the red carpet before the 85th Academy Awards. (Reuters/Lucas Jackson)

Something notably different about this year’s Oscars was that six student filmmakers—not models—carried the statuettes to celebrity presenters. That’s because the Oscars did a search last year in which it asked students to create short, half-minute videos that answered one simple question, “How will you contribute to the future of movies?”

The six winners included three women, and all the winners are representative of a changing demographic: four are clearly students of color. One student, Hearin Ko, won a coveted spot by stating that she thinks “the film industry is ready for the next Asian film director,” adding that she wants to solidify magical realism as a recognized film genre. Fittingly, Ang Lee, who hails form Taiwan, won his second Oscar last night for Best Director for Life of Pi—a work that could qualify as magical realism.

But most of last night’s Oscars magic stopped there, and was instead a lengthy celebration of xenophobia and misogyny.

Host Seth MacFarlane’s tirade against people of color and women started early with cheap shots against Don Cheadle and Rihanna. But soon, William Shatner, as Captain Kirk on the big screen, warned MacFarlane against “destroying the academy awards.”

The Captain announced that he was communicating from the twenty-third century—indicating a deep investment in hoping that white men will still be playing starring roles as intervening saviors two centuries from now. What made Captain Kirk’s appearance especially offensive was that it was insidiously shrouded as an attempt to meddle in order to stop MacFarlane from offending countless people. Instead, the Captain used this opportunity as an introduction to a profoundly misogynist song titled “We Saw Your Boobs.”

The song ended with an unnecessary backup from The Gay Men’s Chorus of Los Angeles. MacFarlane appeared compelled to explain that he’s not a member of the chorus—but Captain Kirk explained that in 2015, MacFarlane would, indeed, join the chorus. This indication that MacFarlane will come out of the closet annoyingly yielded a long laugh from the audience.

Throughout the night, the audience appeared more offended by a joke about Abraham Lincoln’s killer 150 years ago than by MacFarlane’s racist, sexist and homophobic attacks against living people today. The remainder of the show remained stable ground for MacFarlane’s lazy hatred.

But it’s not just what was said last night that was so offensive. It’s also what was missing. A long, moving tribute to major Hollywood contributors who were lost in 2012 failed to include Lupe Ontiveros and Russell Means. The award-winning Ontiveros appeared in some 150 acting roles in her lifetime. She was often cast as a maid, but worked to remind audiences that maids are also complex human beings. Her career paved the way for Latinas in Hollywood. Yet the Oscars seemed to forget that.

Russell Means (Oglala Sioux) started his acting career in his fifties after a lifetime of political activism, perhaps most famously with the American Indian Movement. While some were, at times, disappointed with Means’s political decisions, it’s unacceptable that the Academy would obscure his vast contributions as a Native actor in the entertainment industry.

The Academy had a chance to include Ontiveros and Means in their online tribute to those stars they couldn’t fit in the program last night. But neither Ontiveros nor Means is there.

In one song during last night’s Oscars, MacFarlane crooned about Beasts of the Southern Wild, which he quipped “was made for fifty bucks, with a star whose name looks like a vision test.” MacFarlane was trying to be funny at the expense of 9-year-old African-American newcomer Quvenzhané Wallis, whose young age he also eerily referenced in terms of dating. Yet even this borderline pedophilic comment passed as acceptable—perhaps because the Twitterverse was busy debating whether it was acceptable for The Onion to call Wallis the c-word.

The Oscars deliberately asked young people how they would contribute to the future of film and rewarded six of them. Wallis, meanwhile, wasn’t waiting for the future. At 9 years old, she has already arrived. The way the Academy treated her last night indicates that talented young women of color will be hazed on a world stage, while an audience of her supposed peers sits by and chuckles. MacFarlane equated Wallis’ name with a “vision test,” yet if he were the one whose eyes were being examined, he clearly failed to see the talent in front of him.

With an average age of 62, the Academy remains 94 percent white and 77 percent male. Perhaps we should be asking ourselves if we expect anything different than last night’s horrible excuse for an awards show.

Hundreds of workers from the Life of Pi visual effects team protested the ceremony over working conditions. Read Allison Kilkenny's take.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x